Analyzing Product placement in Movies

Hi. I need a cover letter of Congress and U.S Foreign policy

Rennaiscience (History course) Immanuel Kant dares you to show what you know about early modern Europe. He asks that you focus solely on the materials from this course. Kant freaks out when he reads things taken from random websites or other material not assigned in the course. The idea is to think about what we did specifically in this class. (For example, ONLY FROM TEXTBOOK LIKE THE EUROPEAN WORLD, LIVES UNCOVERED, http://www.humanrights.com/what-are-human-rights.html, http://chnm.gmu.edu/revolution/etc), Kant politely asks that you write at least 550 to 750 words (2+ to 3 pages, typed and double-spaced) on one of the topics below (a little more is fine too). This is a thought essay but do try to have a clear thesis and provide some examples or evidence from course texts where appropriate. 1. Did life for the “average” person change in fundamental ways between 1400 and 1800? If you took the average man or woman, say a farmer/peasant, craftsperson, small-time merchant, or their wife, and compared their lives in 1400 and in 1800 how much do you think their lives had changed? What aspects of life changed the most, and what changed the least? You can think in terms of their everyday lives, their work, their leisure, their homes, their education, occupational opportunities and the like. How might they view things like religion, politics or medicine? Was the average person’s life fundamentally the same or different in important and essential ways? You can focus on a single “type” or look at more than one but focus has advantages. Be clear about gender, status and profession as you think about this—as well as where the person lived. You can make comparisons to others whose lives might have changed more or less (in the same time period). 2. What was not modern about early modern Europe? Some scholars view the period from roughly 1400 to 1800 as marking the beginning of modernity, hence the period is called early modern. Others believe it is more useful to think of the period as an extension of earlier history, and that industrialization marks the real break toward modernity. The period did witness many changes but these do not necessarily mark out a linear movement toward modernity. So write about the ways the period was not modern. 3. By 1800 Europe had emerged “as the major driving force behind global developments.” (Kümin, 2nd ed, p 362) In what specific ways was Europe a driving force in the world by 1800? How had Europe come to play this role? What were the limitations of European influence? Be sure to include that last point and be careful to look at expansion only up to 1800 and not include the extensive colonization of the nineteenth century in your answer.

Here is my order number: 0010093. I would like to continue with my paper. I want to add 4 more pages to it. I want the same writer. For the second half of my paper, I want you to look for the other side of the debate. I want you to look at 2 other primary sources I sent you. I want you to analyze and interpret the primary sources, build a case for your argument with additional support. I want you to choose the source that are against armed resistance and then draw a conclusion. You presented one side of the debate, now I would like you to focus on the other side of the debate. Please do not use wikipedia. Only from the sources I send from the previous paper.

Readings for Section B: Friedman, T. L. (2017). “Chapter Two: What the Hell Happened in 2007” in Thank You for Being Late: An Optimist’s Guide to Thriving in the Age of Accelerations . Picador/Farrar Straus and Giroux.ActionsHarari, Y. (2018). “Chapter Four: Equality” in 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. New York: Random House.Actions 10. The World is Flat was published in 2005. Once Tom Friedman finished the book he thought he would be able to return to the business of being a journalist, comfortable with the ‘framework’ that he had established. Then 2007 happened and challenged his thinking. How does he explain how the year 2007 altered his “view of how the Machine worked” in his chapter “What the Hell Happened in 2007”?[I encourage you to consult a number of sources when developing your answer. For instance, Tom Friedman’s MIT Compton Lecture (Links to an external site.) [Fall 2018] and his discussion with Yuval Harari “How To Understand Our Times” (Links to an external site.) might be of utility, not just as substance for this and the following questions, but also as useful prompts to consider your own thinking on various ‘questions of our day’).] 11) Friedman draws attention to the following graph (Astro Teller graph) in his chapter “What the Hell Happened in 2007”. 11. Please explain what “we are here” actually means in this graph and using both the writings of Friedman and Harari please outline several risks of being in this position on the graph (Please be thorough with your explanation). 12. Citing Teller, Friedman argues that we are all going to need to learn the “bicycle trick”. What does he mean by this metaphor?

Why does Coser believe that conflict is good for society? Discuss a real-life example in which a social conflict followed and lent support to Coser’s theory. Discuss a real-life example of the Thomas Theorem: “If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences.” What does this mean to you? How can it be applied to the example you’ve identified? “Conflict theory” derives from the critical work of Karl Marx on economic inequality under capitalism; Coser’s analysis comes from structural-functionalism. How might social conflict be understood using symbolic interactionism? Come up with and discuss an application of this theory to the question of conflict.

1) Break the essay into the following sections Section 1: p1-4 Section 2: p5-7 Section 3: p8-10 Section 4: p11-13 2) Begin with the big picture. Give the sections a label that describes its job in the essay. How does each section function in relation to the rest of the essay? 3) FORM: Draw a shape for the essay’s form. What is the physical appearance? How does the argument move and bend around a problem through each paragraph and through each section? 4) IDEA: what new idea does the author uncover through their intellectual work? Is this idea implicit or explicit? How does she get there? What rhetorical moves does the writer make to deepen their initial idea? 5) Spend about 10 mins reflecting on your work: What do you like about Bialas’s structure? How might this help you structure your own essay? Review the “Lens Essay” selections for Progression 1 as well as exercise 1.4. Which one might work as a lens for the primary text you’ve chosen? Why?

Hi, I attached a example essay in the file, too. Let me know if you have any questions. Please put the same student and professor name so that I don’t need to edit them. I need FIVE separate ONE page papers for each of the following topics: Infectious Diseases Cardiovascular Disease Sexually Transmitted Diseases & AIDS Stem Cells Cancer Below are the instructions: Special Topics Discussion-“Teach me something I don’t know”: Each student will select any relevant article, journal, evidence-based practice research, etc. pertaining to each of the special topics. You should then write a brief one page reflection paper on what you learned, your reaction, and how you might apply this information in your field of work. Topics: ● Drugs & the Mind ● Infectious Diseases ● Cardiovascular Disease ● Sexually Transmitted Diseases & AIDS ● Stem Cells ● Cancer The syllabus is attached too, please scam it before you started! Thank you!

Case Study: Boutique Hotels Read the Boutique Hotels case study on pages 100 – 101 of your textbook, and answer the three questions at the end. 1. What are the operational challenges associated with developing new boutique hotels? 2. What can we learn from the mass customization of tangible goods that can be applied to the mass customization of services (boutique hotels)? 3. How can boutique hotels maintain a consistent/ standard level of service without compromising their unique/ personalized service mission?

1、Read Case Brannigan Foods: Strategic Marketing Planning, Quelch & Kindley. In the Brannigan Foods case we examine a company that is a large player in a shrinking market. Members of the management team have identified four options for allocating resources and addressing the issues. For this Forum take the role of Division Head Ber Clark. Which of the four options would you choose? Why?- Write a brief post with your answer in Forum 2.0. As you craft you post, consider that you are writing to your colleagues in the company. （DON’T CITE anything and just write your opinion）350-450 words 2、In the file “examples”, there are other students’ answers for the first question. Read the instruction in the file and choose one to comment. 50-150 words

OUTLINE FOR PAPER What is the name of the artist who created the artwork? 2. What kind of an artwork is it? 3. What medium does it appear to be made from? 4. What is the name of the artwork? 5. When was this artwork created? 6. Where was this artwork created? 7. Name some other major events or developments in history that occurred during the same time this artwork was created. 8. List all the literal objects you see in the composition (trees, people, animals, shapes, mountains, etc.). 9. Consider the significant art elements that are present in this artwork and describe them: 10. Discuss how the artist manipulated the art elements to create the following principles: a. Balance b. scale c. Unity d. Variety e. Emphasis f. Rhythm 2 g. Movement Interpretation Interpretation 11. What do you think the artist was trying to say though this art piece? 12. Why do you think the artist created this artwork? 13. Describe any additional meanings you think the artists might have intended. 14. What feelings do you have when looking at this artwork? 15. Do you think there are things in the artwork that represent other things – symbols? Colors? Objects? What? Evaluation Make sure to justify your opinions. 16. Do you like this artwork? Why? 17. Do you think this artwork is “good” or “bad”? Why? 3 18. Do think this is an important work? To whom do you think it would be important? Why? 19. Would display this artwork in your home? Should it be in a museum? Why? 20. Is there something about this work of art that you think should have been done differently? What and Why?