Applied Business Research & Statistics. Bell Computer Company

Change Proposal Technology has been credited with contributing to a safer patient environment. Create a change proposal for a new technology that will contribute to a safer patient environment. Examine human factors including resistance to change into the expanded use of informatics. Be sure to include how your proposed change will impact patient safety, how you will measure the impact of your change, and how you will communicate and implement this change. Submissions Details: Submit your response in a 3- to 5-page Microsoft Word document. APA 6th edition needed. Turnitin has to be below 30% Grading ruburic Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D Range) (17-19) 19 points Satisfactory (C Range) (20-22) 22 points Proficient (B Range) (22-25) 25 points Exemplary (A Range) (25-28) 28 points Summarized how proposal will impact patient safety. Student did not submit assignment Did not summarized how proposal will impact patient safety, or the details are vague or nonexistent. Summarized how proposal will impact patient safety, but there is a lack of detail. Summarized how proposal will impact patient safety. Explanations were good but could be more detailed. Thoroughly summarized how proposal will impact patient safety. / 28 This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D Range) (17-19) 19 points Satisfactory (C Range) (20-22) 22 points Proficient (B Range) (22-25) 25 points Exemplary (A Range) (25-28) 28 points Summarized how impact of change will be measured. Student did not submit assignment Did not summarized how impact of change will be measured or the details are vague or nonexistent. Summarized how impact of change will be measured, but there is a lack of detail. Summarized how impact of change will be measured. Explanations were good but could be more detailed. Summarized how impact of change will be measured. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas. / 28 This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D Range) (19-22) 22 points Satisfactory (C Range) (22-25) 25 points Proficient (B Range) (26-28) 28 points Exemplary (A Range) (29-32) 32 points Summarized a communication strategy. Student did not submit assignment Did not summarized a communication strategy, or the details are vague or nonexistent. Summarized a communication strategy, but there is a lack of detail. Summarized a communication strategy. Explanations were good but could be more detailed. Summarized a communication strategy. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas. / 32 This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D Range) (19-22) 22 points Satisfactory (C Range) (22-25) 25 points Proficient (B Range) (26-28) 28 points Exemplary (A Range) (29-32) 32 points Examined the human factors including resistance to change. Student did not submit assignment Did not examine the human factors including resistance to change, or the details are vague or nonexistent. Examined the human factors including resistance to change, but there is a lack of detail. Examined the human factors including resistance to change. Explanations were good but could be more detailed. Examined the human factors including resistance to change. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas. / 32 This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Student did not submit assignment Did not write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; nor demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation, but there is a lack of details. Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Explanations were good but could be more detailed. Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas. / 20 Rubric Total Score Total / 140 Overall Score Overall Score No Submission0 points minimum Emerging (F through D Range)96 points minimum Satisfactory (C Range)110 points minimum Proficient (B Range)124 points minimum Exemplary (A Range)140 points minimum

Chris Rock: Tamborine 1) Explain the context of your primary text (what are the various issues at stake, positions people take, and relevance to our discussions?) 2) What’s your thinking so far on that text? (remember that that thinking may change as you conduct your research) 3) Discuss the kinds of research you expect to have to do in order to explore that topic more thoroughly (will you be looking exclusively at scholarly journals? Are there relevant popular resources you may use?). While your particular primary and secondary texts are up to you, everyone must select from within the following three umbrella topics: • The empowerment or disenfranchisement of particular social groups through the use of comedy, including race, class, and/or gender o Consider comics who take on race, class, gender, sexuality explicitly in their work and examine how they engage those topics and to what end. • The rhetorical value of irony o Consider comics like Stephen Colbert who employ irony as their primary method of advancing an argument – what are they able to accomplish through those ends and are there limits? • Rhetorical transgression o Consider comics who “go too far.” What can an examination of how a particular comic has gone too far help us understand our culture and society? What’s the difference between Tig Notaro and Dave Chappelle?

Details: 12 pt. Times New Roman font Double-spaced 1″ margins Last name and page numbers as headers In-text citations, if possible Prompt: For this exam, we are focusing on Nikki Finney’s Rice and the particular challenge we’ll work on is how to read analytically across more than one poem. To structure that work, I’d like you to begin with an idea or concept (e.g. body, land, family, gender, violence etc.) that you understand to be broadly relevant to the project of Finney’s volume. In the first sentence of your exam, you’ll identify this concept. Then, you’ll formulate a question about that concept that is big enough to be applicable to more than one poem, but not so broad as to be ungrounded in the specific poems that you’ll close read. A question like: “Why is the concept of family important to Finney’s Rice?” is too broad; one like: “How does Finney use the idea of outer-space to theorize Blackness?” is probably too specific to “Mae/I”; but something like: “What potentially non- normative forms of reproduction does Finney think about using the metaphor of the seed?” is about right. Then, you’ll show how two poems answer the question you’ve posed. You do not have to find a unifying answer to the questions across the two poems. Instead, what links your analyses of the poems will be the question itself. If you’d like you can even structure your answer in numbered sections (i. introduction ii. reading one iii. reading two).

Here is my order number: 0010093. I would like to continue with my paper. I want to add 4 more pages to it. I want the same writer. For the second half of my paper, I want you to look for the other side of the debate. I want you to look at 2 other primary sources I sent you. I want you to analyze and interpret the primary sources, build a case for your argument with additional support. I want you to choose the source that are against armed resistance and then draw a conclusion. You presented one side of the debate, now I would like you to focus on the other side of the debate. Please do not use wikipedia. Only from the sources I send from the previous paper.

Think about what is the theme/point behind the story of: “A Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe Please incorporate The Elements of Fiction and please use New Criticism to interpret the story of “A Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe Avoid any and all summary sites within your essay and use MLA format and citations in this essay. Please make sure your essay has a clear introduction and thesis statement (topic plus point about that topic) at the bottom of your introduction. Please introduce your chosen short story in your introduction. Make sure your body paragraphs are focus on proving your thesis statement-theme of the story. Please make sure to have a conclusion that does not bring in new information. Use literary present and third person in your essay.

NOTE: Writing Assignment #1 is not associated with the topic you were required to choose for the second writing assignment. Consider writings assignment #1 as the opportunity to share who you are with your instructor as well consider how you are connected to the topics we will address this semester. Instructions Part I – Biographic Information Communicate what you’d like your instructor to know about you. Part II – Connect to the Material We’ll Address This Semester Review the topics we will cover this semester. Choose from the following 2 options: Ask yourself: Have you or someone you know personally had an experience associated with one of the topics we’ll address this semester? Briefly explain the situation and offer your opinion on the situation or outcome. Choose a topic of interest associated with course content. Engage in a web search about the topic. Briefly explain why you chose the topic and your reaction to the material you found online about the topic. The assignment should be 500 words or less.

Annotated Bibliography Sample/Help https://owl(dot)purdue(dot)edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/annotated_bibliographies/annotated_bibliography_samples.html

For college admision

Please complete according to the articles I uploaded and the job requirements.

Assignment 1: The Annotated Bibliography – Due Week 3 Project Overview: For this project, you’ll choose a food or drink item, a cuisine, an invention, or an idea, and then research how four geographic concepts are related to and affect your topic. Instead of presenting your research as a traditional paper, you’ll use PowerPoint to create a narrated presentation. Your presentation will be structured like a paper, including a title, introduction to the topic, main body, summary and conclusions, and references. Creative use of properly cited graphics and photos from the Internet relevant to your topic is required. First, choose a food item, cuisine, invention, or idea that interests you. Some will have more information available about them than others, so it’s worth doing some investigation before you settle on one. If you’re not sure if your desired topic is appropriate, please feel free to ask! Once you have selected your topic, you will then do research to see how each of the following geographic concepts affects or is related to your topic:1. Regions 2. Cultural Landscape 3. Diffusion 4. Distance decay. The first two concepts are covered in the first chapter of your textbook. Diffusion is covered in Chapter 8, Section 2 (page 484). Distance decay refers to the fact that influence and interaction between locations decreases as the distance between them increases. As such, it has a significant influence on how things change as they diffuse away from their point of origin. Be sure to address these specific geographic terms and concepts in your work. You don’t need to address them in this order, but you do need to address all of them. You may use “subsets” of these definitions (e.g. contagious diffusion) if such subsets exist. Be sure to refer to your text and other reliable resources to ensure you completely understand these concepts. You should be detailed in your treatment of these concepts – for instance, you should explain both how and why your choice varies by region, and how and why it has been affected by distance decay. Remember that geography, as an academic discipline, seeks to explain why things vary from place to place, not just describe how they do. You will complete this project in 3 separate assignments: an annotated bibliography, an outline, and your final presentation. In this assignment, you will complete your annotated bibliography. Completing the project in separate assignments allows you to work your way up to the final presentation, and provides opportunity for feedback along the way. Assignment Objective: Assess sources for your research for your final presentation (for credibility, reliability, and relevance) and list references in proper APA format through the creation of an annotated bibliography. Assignment Instructions: An annotation is a summary and evaluation, and your annotated bibliography will include a summary and evaluation of some of the sources (or references) you will use for your presentation. To prepare for this assignment, I recommend that you do the following: Read these directions carefully. Review the sample annotated bibliography provided to you below. Read the grading criteria below.The grading criteria is a detailed evaluation that I will use to assess your performance. It also will help you understand what is expected you as you prepare your assignment. Message me with any questions! The reason the annotated bibliography is included as part of the research project is that writing an annotated bibliography provides excellent preparation for the final presentation. One of the issues regarding any type of research is the credibility of the sources used, particularly those obtained from various websites. By forcing you to evaluate your potential sources carefully, the annotated bibliography helps you determine if the sources you chose are credible and relevant to your topic. It will also help you understand the topic better, which will help you develop your presentation. For this project, you will assess three sources to include: 1) a complete citation for each source, 2) a summary of each source, and 3) an evaluation of each source. Three sources are required for this assignment (i.e., you are to write an annotation for each source). However, you must use five or more sources in your final presentation. Use the TEMPLATE below to summarize and evaluate each of your three sources. Citation: Written in APA reference list format. For more help with formatting, see APA handout Summary: What is the purpose of the source, review article, original research? What topics are covered? This section is generally 3-5 sentences that summarize the author’s main point. For more help, see this link on paraphrasing sources. Evaluation: After summarizing the article (or research paper or book), it is necessary to evaluate it and state where you found it – its source (e.g.,journal, website, etc.). Briefly answer the following questions in 3-5 sentences: What is the format or type of source (e.g., peer-reviewed journal paper, website, book)? How reliable is the information in the article, and how credible is the source (e.g., website’s sponsoring organization, journal or book publisher) and the author(s)? For more help, see this handout on evaluating resources. Additional Resources: Please see the resources below at The Owl at Purdue site for more information on how to write an annotated bibliography as well as other pages on the site to assist you with the other parts of the research paper: Annotated Bibliographies Annotated Bibliography Example Annotated Bibliography Samples Evaluation: Please review the Annotated Bibliography Grading Criteria below that describes how your annotated bibliography will be graded. Software: As an APUS student, you have free access to Microsoft Office for both Windows and MacOS, which includes Microsoft Word and PowerPoint. Submission Instructions: You must submit your Annotated Bibliography as a “Microsoft Word” document using the template provided (rather than a Word Pad, Works, etc. document) AND title your file name as FirstInitialLastname_Assign1.doc. Browse for the file you want to submit by clicking Add a File. You can attach files from your local computer or storage device, a personal locker, a group locker, or Brightspace ePortfolio. Enter any comments you want to submit with the file. Click Submit. add: Hey please feel free to switch the topic if you can research something better! I would for it to stay a cuisine preferably i.e curry, pasta Please write about a particular cuisine with respect to the 4 areas in the instruction