Artists and Artistic Movement – Tuni Bunchō’s Tiger Family and Magpies

list 5 references (in correct APA style) that you intend to use for the cultural/historical portion of your literature review. References must be listed alphabetically. Under each reference , write one solid paragraph that: Paragraph 1) accurately summarizes the article in your own words Paragraph 2) explains why you think this article will be useful for your literature review You MUST include: •a minimum of 2 primary sources •a minimum of 1 scholarly , peer-reviewed article from an academic journal The historic portion that was chosen was politics/government/laws You can use the Justinian codes of laws as a primary source. The one that is translated to English. The two remaining articles can be from the web, but remember that they still need to come from reliable sources. Any web articles MUST be .org, .gov, or .edu I forgot to mention the history portion with the topic laws/government/politics has to be around the time of Justinian plague. We have to write in the second paragraph how it will help our next paper. Which is writing about the politics/laws/government of that time. Nothing of the Justinian plague just history.

A few ideas for winning : ) ❏ Remember to make a copy of this document. Then change the part that has my name to the college you are in and the semester and year to your name and first initial. ❏ You will turn in this whole document online, not just the answers. I also need the questions : ) ❏ There is no quiz for this section ❏ Read the lecture note carefully in order to answer the questions. Avoid skimming because it makes it more difficult to answer the questions. ❏ If troubled there is a video. ❏ Answer the questions and turn-in. Help video: Video Paul Andersen. Diploid vs. Haploid Cells. Bozeman Science Now, if we shift from the idea that any trait is inherited by a species in a family lineage, AKA Mendel’s first law, the principle law of segregation, we can begin to see some of the other complexity in the basic inheritance model. In this section we will review the idea of genes as opposed to taits. Think of traits as the whole cake and the genes as the precise instructions for how to use, make, and acquire the ingredients for the cake. The cake has traits for certain; the frosting, the decorations, the filling, the bread or cake layers, and the decorations. However, how to get what is needed and how to use it are not easily observed as are the traits. The key concept we are using here is Mendel’s second law of independent assortment. Meaning, we are making the assumption based on previous work that traits are inherited from the parents. Next, we are trying to show how the instructions for a trait exist in independent packs. The independent gene usually works in combination with other genes. To add to complexity genes can be expressed or not. Meaning , a gene may be present but not show, this is referred to as dominance and recessive. As we have learned that cells contain DNA which activates things by using RNA, both are ractive and function to produce and build proteins which do things. The details for production are in the genes. How the genes show are the traits. Simply stated cells contain DNA which uses RNA to build proteins and the information on how to do that are stored in genes as segments of the DNA. The things built are known as traits. Gametes Now, as we continue the exploration of inheritance we have established that cells are micro-machines which store all the things needed for production and function. In this lesson we are demonstrating Mendel’s second law of independent assortment. Hence, we use the cell. There is a special kind of cell, a sex cell, referred to as a gamete, which is either a sperm or an ovum. A sex cell gets one of the of alleles from each parent. An allele is a gene for something but is a variant form. For example, is a gene for sex type is variant because it has a combination of X for male and Y for female. The offspring inherit the genes either xxs and or y from the parents. Consequently the genetic structure for offspring can vary. The X and Y are alleles. It is at times complex to understand genetics but for this course we will explore a few of the ideas. For example, an allele can be viewed with the ABo blood groups. That is, for humans we have three basic and understated alleles for blood; A , B, and o. We have genetic types for blood which are similar but… what is not similar is the specific cell type. They are similar for blood, but not because of what type. They are similar because of the function but not type. Those parts of the gene which code for the type are alleles. There is an added complexity sometimes and rarely, one allele is truly dominant over another. In the expression of genes for humans in the ABo blood groups A and B are codominant. Meaning they coexist on more or less equal standing. However, o type is not dominant and is referred to as recessive. That is, type o is passive to A or B and will not change the blood to type o. This is not too complex so far. However, the truth be told it is far more complex such as when considering the ideas of Rh factors, what parts of a cell or gene are dominant and which are recessive become a more complex puzzle to build. That is, basic Mendelian models for inheritance may not be adequate for resolving more complex issues but it is a start. There are reasons that more complex models need to be considered two are pleiotropy and polygenetics. Meaning that with pleiotropy, one gene can be used as a tool for many effects. Another iswith, polygenetics which uses more than one gene or for any one of many effects. It is not simple to start at the more complex and more accurate models.Therefore, it is useful to start with a two part model (refer to img.Gamete Selection 1 and 2) then to move onto more complex ones (refer to img.Gamete Selection 3) for example a much more complex 3 sets in two part model (refer to img.Gamete Selection 4). However, it is important to note the simple steps are not able to present the complexity of the human genome. Starting with some simple ideas, the genotypes for blood are different from the blood groups. For humans simply and usually blood groups are referred to as A, B, and o. However, the groups are actually made of two alleles for the blood cell. The alleles for A, B, or o types can combine in a two part system. A mother or a father must have at least two alleles but may have the alleles in combination. For example in an ABo blood group, a parent with type A has either genotype from below as a genotype. Both are simply named type A blood group. 1.AA (homozygous dominant) same 2.Ao (heterozygous) different 3.AB (codominant) both show Blood also has other genotypes for example; if one parent has genotype AA blood and the other parent has genotype BB blood then the offspring will get one A from parent one and one B from parent two resulting in type AB blood (codominant) (refer to table1). This shows Mendel’s first law, the principle law of segregation. However, a parent could be A for the blood group but their genotype could be Ao. This complicates the issue because now there are two sex cell options for blood grenotypes from that parent who has Ao alleles for A blood group, not just A but also an allelle for o. Consequently, when we combine parent one with Ao with parent two BB the outcome is less clear because each parent passes on half of their genotype. In the case of parent two it is simply a B because there are no other choices. However, for parent one it is either A or o. Therefore the offspring of the two parents could inherit A, B or o because they are options. Meaning the offspring could be AB (codominant) or Bo (heterozygous). This shows Mendel’s second law of independent assortment that the traits exist in packets which can be transferred to offspring independently. This can be shown in a handy tool known as a Punnett Square (refer to table 1 and table 2). It is used by placing one of the parent’s(p1)genotype in the first column and other parent’s (p2) on the top row. Then using the intersections to predict the genotypic outcome of the offspring. Table 1: Mendel’s principle law of segregation The only outcome is AB which came from the parents Table 2: Mendel’s law of independent assortment Because the alleles for blood A and o are unique, they can be inherited independently. This is true of all alleles. We know that trait alleles have at least two parts for simplified Mendalian genetics. That allows some easy applications. We do not have to use A, B, or o to represent any trait. We can use Aa, Bb, Cc, etc. because uppercase represents dominant and lower case represents recessive. Some prefer to use a letter as an allele which represents the idea for example, T for tall, t for small, etc… All these ideas form together to show the principle law of segregation from Gregor Mendel, that all traits an offspring has comes directly from their parents. Also we show the principle law of independence that; traits can exist as separate from other traits and be passed down to offspring. That being said, offspring get the genetic information from their parents and the parents pass part of the DNA to offspring separate from the whole DNA. A parent passed on part of the DNA through creating sex cells which have half the DNA required for a life. The sex cell is a gamete and comes as either a sperm or an ovum. The process of creating a sex cell is meiosis. When a sex cell is created in meiosis, the parent’s whole cell more or less divides in two cleaving a sex cell with half of the alleles from the parent. Therefore, if only one trait were to be examined (img.Gamete Selection 1) the result in the haploid daughter cells, would be in each of the two sex cells there would be half of the parent DNA; in this case review a parent with Aa (heterozygous) in img.Gamete Selection 1. The parent has a two part sequence which codes for a trait. The trait will express according to the patterns and to the effectiveness of the gene to express itself over others and the frequency with which that gene is expressed and the relationship of the affect and ecology of the individual. A trait does not simply show up, usually. There are many things which contribute to the expression. A person is put together, genetically like a complex machine. In this example we see nuts and bolts which need both parts to be useful (img.Gamete Selection 1). That is, a parent has two parts in connection that are useful but they can only pass one to the offspring meaning half. The other half will come from the other parent. When a sex cell is made there are many complex steps which have been covered already in Cells and DNA section you may also recall the added complexity of crossing-over and mixing of the DNA resulting in many unique sex cells from a single person. Therefore, there are many possibilities for the offspring from a parent because the system assures diversity. In the following drawings the process and result is simplified, in order to be direct and correct about the process of half the genes, passed onto offspring, by way of meiosis, and intercourse. The outcome is potentially limitless and diversity is assured by the process of life and procreation. img.Gamete Selection 1 Given: The parent cell has two parts. One is an A representing a dominant trait. There other is “a” which is a recessive one. The parent cell Aa is (heterozygous) meaning different. img.Gamete Selection 2 Given: The parent cell has two parts. One is a B representing a dominant trait. There other is “b” which is a recessive one. The parent cell Bb is (heterozygous) meaning different. img.Gamete Selection 3 Given: Parent 1starts with a cell which has two more parts. The cell from p1 parent cell Aa is (heterozygous) meaning different. P1(parent 1) has an A representing a dominant trait. There other is “a” which is a recessive one. P1 starts with a cell which has two more parts. The cell from p2 parent cell Bb is (heterozygous) meaning different.The parent cell Bb is (heterozygous) meaning different. P1 has a B representing a dominant trait. There other is “b” which is a recessive one. One is a B representing a dominant trait. There other is “b” which is a recessive one. Noted in the below gamete P1 is far more complex than for 1 trait. Gamete selection is from one parent. In that, a parent only has the One set of DNA. That DNA is divided into two parts or chromatids. Each chromatid has information but can carry different codes for the same thing such as for blood, or height etc. However, traits are simply controlled by one genetic pairing and there are many more genes. The information for genes is coded in 20,000-25,000 genes which work with others genes creating nearly limitless possibilities. Tracking these traits is complex See below if we change from 2 sets of two part traits (refer to img.Gamete Selection 3) to 3 sets of two part traits (refer to img.Gamete Selection 4). Then imagine what 25,000 genes may look like. img.Gamete Selection 4 Answer the following questions. Use the above document only to answer the questions. You can type in the answers if you have made a copy and renamed this document as your own. 1. Is a bubble diagram the same as factoring but using a picture (refer to img.Gamete Selection 1) ? two parts. Yes or no and why? (1 pt) 2. What is in the 2 part code/genotype for sex cell 1 and sex cell 2 (refer to img.Gamete Selection 2)? (1 pt) 3. What is in the 1 part code for sex cell 3 and the 1 part code for sex cell 4 refer to img.Gamete Selection 2)? (1 pt) 4. If P1 has traits of Aa and Bb then what are the outcomes for the codes for the sex cells, list them there are four ( refer to img.Gamete Selection 3). (1 pt) 5. Why are pleiotropy and polygenic potentially issues for Mendalian models? (1 pt) 6. Referring to the drawings in img.Gamete Selection 4; how is the branch matrix (tree) simpler to identify the parts and outcomes compared to drop-down (bubbles) or the modified FOIL method? (1 pt) 7. What ways are there to show math processes other than linear expressions or linear equations seen in this section on gametes? There are 5 choices list 3. (3 pt) 8. Would it be helpful to know/learn other ways to do math rather than only equations? (1 pt)

It should be 3 full pages in a MLA format. I will attach the question and sample of the paper how we need to do it. So please check it.

Please read the instruction exactly , and the citation should be the college art history coverage. In this week’s lesson, and in previous weeks, we have discussed works of art and the contexts in which they exist/are shown. How does seeing an object in its original context, and in a new (and perhaps unintended) context, change the way a work of art communicates? What, for example, is the difference between seeing a medieval altarpiece in the context of the church ( and perhaps a particular chapel) for which it was made versus seeing the same altarpiece at the Museum of Fine Arts behind glass? Or, seeing a Minimalist cube in a gallery for which it was made versus outdoors in an open-air courtyard at the Museum of Modern Art? Along with the differences, are there any similarities in the two experiences (“original” versus new settings)? Please note that the point here is not to choose a “favorite” setting (original or new), but simply to reflect on the similarities and differences in the experience of the work of art when its setting has changed. Finally, can you cite at least one example of a work of art discussed in this course in which the original setting has been changed? Discuss. Post your thoughts, following the instructions below. Your post should be two to three paragraphs long.

An effective nurse educator has current, researched knowledge of active learning methods to use in the educational setting. Popular active learning strategies allow students to collaborate with peers and participate in higher order thinking. The purpose of this assignment is to compile an annotated bibliography of active learning strategies within your practicum setting. Provide a 15-entry annotated bibliography of peer-reviewed/scholarly literature related to your chosen practicum topic and active learning teaching methodologies. Include a 150-word summary for each resource that includes the following: Description of the relevancy of the source. Description of the accuracy of the source. Description of the quality of the source. Prepare this assessment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. References Gould, C., et al. (2010). Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections in 2009. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 31(4), 319-326. Magill, S. S., et al. (2014). Multistate point-prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections. N Engl J Med, 370(13), 1198-1208. Nieva, V. F., & Sorra, J. (2003). Safety culture assessment: A tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations. Qual Saf Health Care, 2, 17-23. Parker, V., et al. (2017). Avoiding inappropriate urinary catheter use and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI): a pre-post control intervention study. BMC Health Serv Res, 17(314), 1-9. Umscheid, C., et al. (2011). Estimating the proportion of healthcare-associated infections that are reasonably preventable and the related mortality and costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 32(2), 101-114. WHO. (2011). Report on the burden of endemic healthcare-associated infection worldwide. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/80135/9789241501507_eng.pdf;jsessionid=B527B9530CCA4D8110F008228FF48AA4?sequence=1 Blanck, A. W., et al. (2014). A quasi-experimental study to test a prevention bundle for catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Journal of Hospital Administration, 3(4), 101-108. Leblebicioglu, H., et al. (2013). Impact of a multidimensional infection control approach on catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates in adult intensive care units in 10 cities of Turkey: International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium findings (INICC). Am J Infect Control, 41(10), 885-891. Magill, S. S., et al. (2014). Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care–associated infections. N Engl J Med, 370, 1198-1208. Marra, A., et al. (2011). Preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the zero-tolerance era. Am J Infect Control, 39(10), 817-822. Umscheid, C., et al. (2011). Estimating the proportion of healthcare-associated infections that are reasonably preventable and the related mortality and costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 32(2), 101-114.

Expectations of Privacy and the Cellphone

I would like you to rewrite/edit the answers in the attached Assignment in your way with the same idea as my answers (to avoid Plagiarism). Please let me know if you need any further information. Thank you Note: Some writers ask for extra time. So, please if you don’t have time DO NOT accept my request. I will not give you extra time. Thank you

Country: south africa This assignment asks you to answer three questions: (1) What are the country’s main contributions to GEC (e.g. methane, CO2, biodiversity loss, soil erosion, etc.), and what are their sources (e.g. industry, deforestation, urbanization, etc.)? (2) What are the primary effects of GEC in your assigned country, and who/what is most impacted? (potential and already realized). (3) Taking (1) and (2) above together, what does your analysis tell us about questions of equity and fairness? Please note: In answering this, it is important to keep in mind that the primary effects of GEC on your assigned country are not caused solely by emissions from the country in question – emissions are produced globally, with some countries producing more than others. As you answer this question, be sure to engage with core course concepts. 3-4 pages double spaced 12 pt font. Citations: You must cite a minimum of 4 sources (all of the ones below) Sources: https://climateactiontracker(dot)org/countries/south-africa/sources/ https://www(dot)un(dot)org/africarenewal/magazine/december-2018-march-2019/global-warming-severe-consequences-africa https://cdkn(dot)org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/AR5_IPCC_Whats_in_it_for_Africa.pdf https://www(dot)ipcc(dot)ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WGIIAR5-Chap22_FINAL.pdf https://www(dot)climateinteractive(dot)org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/WCS-Briefing-Statement-Other-Developing-v5.pdf https://www(dot)environment(dot)gov(dot)za/sites/default/files/docs/sanational_determinedcontribution.pdf

1) Explain the context of your primary text (what are the various issues at stake, positions people take, and relevance to our discussions?) 2) What’s your thinking so far on that text? (remember that that thinking may change as you conduct your research) 3) Discuss the kinds of research you expect to have to do in order to explore that topic more thoroughly (will you be looking exclusively at scholarly journals? Are there relevant popular resources you may use?). While your particular primary and secondary texts are up to you, everyone must select from within the following three umbrella topics: • The empowerment or disenfranchisement of particular social groups through the use of comedy, including race, class, and/or gender o Consider comics who take on race, class, gender, sexuality explicitly in their work and examine how they engage those topics and to what end. • The rhetorical value of irony o Consider comics like Stephen Colbert who employ irony as their primary method of advancing an argument – what are they able to accomplish through those ends and are there limits? • Rhetorical transgression o Consider comics who “go too far.” What can an examination of how a particular comic has gone too far help us understand our culture and society? What’s the difference between Tig Notaro and Dave Chappelle? TED LASSO

This is MPA major Assignment This class is Policy Evaluation Analytics This is the first step in preparation for your Mid-Term Exam Assignment (Assignment 2). We will go through robust number of PLMs, building your knowledge of PLMs. This is an iterative process from which you should gain significant understanding of the purpose of such models. This assignment requires students to identify an organization and one of its programs for which the student will develop a PLM in Assignment 2 (Mid-Term Exam). Assignment 1 details follow. Specific Instructions 1. Each student will seek out and identify an organization and one of its programs. Students CAN NOT duplicate organizations or programs. Each student must have a separate entity and program, which much be approved by the instructor. 2. The organizations can be public entities such a municipal government or agency thereof, not for profit organizations (NGO), philanthropic organizations, and even for profit companies. It can be an organization that you work for or in which you participate. It can be a community organization group. The essential requirement is it has program, which may or may not have existing program models. For our purposes it is best if there is no existing documented PLM. 3. Prepare no more than a 1- page narrative that: (a) Identifies the organization which you will use for Assignment 2; (b) Provides brief description of the organization, explaining what and where it is and what it does; and the specific program type that you will analyze. Also provide the url for the organization; (c) What relationship you have with the organization, if any; and (d) Your specific interest in the program.