Artwork Analysis – Pablo Picasso Guernica

Week 2 – Discussion: Identifying Learning Disabilities Review Ch. 5 of Exceptional Lives. ( **I don’t have the book so if u can find it online otherwise just google 3 different models to determine the presence of a learning disability) Respond to the following prompt in the Identifying Learning Disabilities by Wednesday: 1)What are the three different models for determining the presence of a learning disability? 2)In your opinion, what are the pros and cons with each model?

Please do introduction, methods, results and discussion following all the information given. Please use the information in red as reference and not copy it and be mindful of space limits for each section. Hypothesis and figures are attached, Intro (2/3 page) methods (1/2) Results(1/3) discussion (2/3) https://dropfiles(dot)org/kI5aWit9

How would you design or redesign a benefits program in a company with more than 100 employees? What benefits would you offer and why? Be specific. What issues should you consider? Include the cost of the benefits you would include. (This means the actual dollar amount of each benefit.) How is this different than a company with less than 100 employees? (20 points) Complete the Pay and Benefit Scenarios. For each identify the issue and possible solutions (6 points) Pay and Benefit Scenarios: Ida works 25 hours per week as a part-time customer service representative. She receives legally mandated benefits. Ida performs the same work/tasks as the other three employees who work 40 hours per week. These employees receive medical and dental insurance, retirement matches and child care benefits. Is this situation legal? Is it ethical? Explain both John receives a large raise in one year because of superb performance. As a result he is currently receiving $60,000 while others in the same job class are receiving $52,000. Everyone expected John to continue his outstanding performance and productivity. However, John’s performance and productivity have dropped significantly after the raise. What can be done about his pay?

What is Fry’s new evolutionary perspective as described in Ch. 13 of Beyond War? How does he use this new perspective to understand the place of warfare in human life? In answering this question, make sure you address the following: –What long-standing framework for human evolution does Fry argue against? Give an example of why he opposes it. –What does his new model argue about the role of violence in human evolution (this relates to hawks, doves, and retaliators)? –What theories and research strategies underpin his model? –On what kind of evidence does Fry place emphasis? –Do you find Fry’s model compelling? Why or why not?

A few ideas for winning : ) ❏ Remember to make a copy of this document. Then change the part that has my name to the college you are in and the semester and year to your name and first initial. ❏ You will turn in this whole document online, not just the answers. I also need the questions : ) ❏ There is no quiz for this section ❏ Read the lecture note and then watch the video in order to answer the questions. ❏ Write an i123a note on the video.paulanderson.bozmanscience.cladogram.anerseniiaqauticus.youtube❏ Answer the 4 questions and turn in. . Classification using cladograms worksheet (10 pts)You will turn in this worksheet. ________________________________________This section is designed as an easy points getter : )The path the course is now taking is to identify traits/characteristics and to think about how those traits have affected the species in question. For example, we have reviewed a bit about the changes in the skeletons of humans and other species. In those things we have noted skeletons have changed in a sequence overtime in that;● Human types have special adaptations which allow and require a two legged walk, aka facultative bipedalism.● There are isolation forces, geographic isolation, which can produce changes in animal types based on the ecosystem. For example,Foster’s Rule.● That variation of species is measurable as noted by Darwin’s Finches.Here in this section, there is a short lesson which gets the student acquainted with the process of biological classification. This is a small and simple lesson to give the idea of distinct traits, and mosaic species. This process can start with some basic assumptions, scientific ones, that things potentially get more complex as they change. It is important to note that a species can become simpler to survive but it also noted that some things become more complex. That being said we will start with the assumption that; things potentially get more complex as they change. Simpler is then older and more complex is newer. Note in following species, Andersenii aquaticus, is about first, the identification of the simply described simplest form of the organism, noted by the membranes (borders) and nothing else distinctive (Table1, Key concept 1.) This lesson assesses Mendel’s first law of: segregation. That is that offspring inherit their traits from parents. Therefore, related species had to get their traits from ones that existed before. It assesses evolutionary theory in showing that organisms tend towards complexity but at time entropy happens and things leave the family line. It shows the theory of phylogenetics ( gene types) and shows the relation in arbitrary time on the cladogram.

Some of the versions of the story we read this week seem to emphasize the prectice or process of storytelling itself, With the reference to “In the Desert Like a Bone” and/or” The Company of Wolves” which I will send the story on the PDF analyze what kind of argument the stories are making about the nature and importance of storytelling For the book in the Angela Carter PDF “The Company Wolves” beings in page 5. If you need anything please let me know

Please answer each question and keep them number so that I know they have been answered. Ethics and Trust in Critical Thinking Decisions 1. Imagine you’re thinking about buying a new car. Before making this important decision, you’ll want to gather as much information as possible to help make the right choice. Determine the level of trust that you would place in information provided by the following sources: a salesman at the car lot, the dealer’s Website, social media (i.e. Facebook), an associate from work, and a close friend. Discuss the key factors involved in assessing the amount of trust that you put into each source. 2. Imagine you’re able to persuade another person. You sincerely believe that your position is 100% right. Explain whether you would slant information in such a way as to make your point(s) seem more credible. Discuss the primary ethical dilemmas that this scenario could cause for both you and the person whom you are trying to persuade. The Value of Critical Thinking 3. First – Give your opinion on whether being an effective critical thinker makes decision making easier or more challenging. Talk about concrete decisions you had to or will have to make. Justify your response. 4. Second – Consider the following statement: “The major difference between a successful person and one that is not successful is that the successful person, over time, tends to make better decisions than the less successful person.” Discuss whether you believe this statement to be true. Explain the fundamental ways in which effectively applying critical thinking concepts has helped you to become more successful.

This cover letter is used for practice of writing in university, so it’s not necessary to write it formally. I will provide you with a guide which teaches you how to write and there are also templates and example inside. Another doc is for the job description. Therefore, according the job description, we write our own cover letter. You can ignore the contact information part, I will write it later.

After reading Chapter 11: “Designing Print and Online Documents” (Markel and Selber) and watching the “Document Design” PowerPoint lecture, turn your attention to the sample technical document linked here. Preview the document: Spend some time studying the design of the document and how those choices suggest a specific audience(s) and purpose(s). In other words, how does the design of the document enable the function of the document? When you have finished studying the document, write a response that addresses the following questions. Support your claims with specific evidence from the document: Markel notes that technical communication serves many purposes, which fall into two broader categories: to “help others learn about a subject, carry out a task, or make a decision” and “to reinforce or change attitudes and motivate readers to take action” (3-4). What is (are) the primary purpose(s) of this document? How and why? What is the relationship between the intended purpose(s) of the document and the document’s primary audience(s)? How and why? Use Markel’s discussion of audience-driven factors (8) to guide your discussion. Finally, how effective is this document in terms of clarity, accessibility, and professional appearance? What recommendations might you make in terms of increasing effectiveness? How and why?

2.4 anbioLAB.mckendricksj.Perception and Misdirection discussion post and reply, prewrite the following and save this in a document before you enter the discussion. After, post the writing and reply to one other person +/-150 be sure to introduce yourself and find one part of their post which is interesting to you (Graded 20 pts) P1. 5 lines or about 50 words. Generally write about perception and misperception based on distraction. Give a direct example from the video by naming the video or the presenter from about v1.Basketball Awareness which demonstrates the loss of detail when focusing on something important to the viewer. Is it easy to lose the main meaning when directed or distracted. P2. 5 lines or about 50 words. Discuss learning about missing the details and learning from the experience. Specifically, how we may have learned not to miss things by watching v1 Basketball Awareness.London Transit.Youtube P3. 5 lines or about 50 words.Give a direct example from the video by naming the video or the presenter v2.Apollo. Robbins.Misdirection.TED.com. which demonstrates the loss of detail when focusing on something important to the viewer. Is it easy to lose track even if it has been learned when directed or learning not to lose track. P4. 5 lines or about 50 words.5 lines or about 50 words. Discuss learning about missing the details and learning from the experience. Specifically, how we may have learned not to miss things by watching v2 Apollo Robbins.Misdirection.TED.com P5. Discuss ethnocentrism in that it is an idea that we are correct about something but mav not see what others mav see.that is. we mav not be riaht or that our priorities mav be P2. 5 lines or about 50 words. Discuss learning about missing the details and learning from the experience. Specifically, how we may have learned not to miss things by watching v1 Basketball Awareness.London Transit.Youtube P3. 5 lines or about 50 words.Give a direct example from the video by naming the video or the presenter v2.Apollo. Robbins.Misdirection.TED.com. which demonstrates the loss of detail when focusing on something important to the viewer. Is it easy to lose track even if it has been learned when directed or learning not to lose track. P4. 5 lines or about 50 words.5 lines or about 50 words. Discuss learning about missing the details and learning from the experience. Specifically, how we may have learned not to miss things by watching v2 Apollo Robbins.Misdirection.TED.com P5. Discuss ethnocentrism in that it is an idea that we are correct about something but may not see what others may see.that is, we may not be right or that our priorities may be different than others as seen in both videos. We experience things based on many factors, perception (a biological function) and means others see the world differently than we do. When we know that others do have the same experiences, do not see the same things, and have a different world view we can begin to acknowledge their differences as a result of their worldview and not always an absolute sense of knowing we are us and yet we alone are right. This is known as cultural relativism.