Caregivers As Patient Advocates: Healing Process Of Patients

Please remember to include , introduction, body and conclusion. In this case scenario my approach will be admitting patient to the hospital due to decompensated heart failure. I propose to start pharmacologic treatment with IV loop diuretics, ACE inhibitors, Betablockers, Oxygen therapy should be started simultaneously to guarantee adecuate oxygenation, daily blood work is necessary to monitor renal function, BNP, echocardiogram for assessment evaluation of the heart condition, other non pharmacologic measures should be implemented such as fluid restriction and low sodium diet 2g/d, daily weight and strict monitoring of intake and output. On admission , social work services should be ordered of course in coordination with attending physician, for Home Health Services, which will include nursing skills and aide at home. Nursing services should be aimed to educate patient and family about prevention of risk factors of CHF exacerbation and prevention of polypharmacy in adults and how to access resources to lower cost of medications and food in the community and attendance to outpatient follow up appointments with cardiologist and primary care physician. In order to better help Mr. P and his wife to understand the teaching I will prefer to use visual aide like power point with illustrations, to help them remember the information and resources from the internet like WebMD with videos about CHF. Teaching plan will include : dietary recommendations and restrictions recognition of s/s of CHF exacerbation when to sick medical attention education about each medication, purpose, side effects. importance of compliance with f/u appointments and Tx.

Write as per project 2 read the “UMD ENL101 P3 Formatting Template for all parts (1).docx” first

The annotated bibliography is about building the rooftop amenities on an observation tower, including bungee jumping, putt-putt course and tiki bar. Annotated Bibliography Students are to write a bibliography that has 3 annotations. ▪MLA rules of citation. ▪Formal rules of writing apply. Each annotation should be 4-5 sentences and at least 120 words. Websites (e.g. Pro-Con.org or ESPN.com) will ​not​ be accepted unless you receive the instructor’s permission in advance. Online articles from reputable newspapers and magazines are of course acceptable.

Assessment Description This assignment comprises two components, a behavioral health prevention program design and a behavioral health prevention summary report, addressing the behavioral and psychological factors promoting healthy living and disease prevention. Part 1: Behavioral Health Prevention Program Design a behavioral health prevention program that outlines the program and addresses the following: Program mission and vision, including theoretical knowledge of working with individuals and families in the community. Stakeholders involved in the program: patients; paraprofessionals; therapists; educational institutions; public health, government, and community agencies; the local community; etc. Roles and responsibilities of stakeholders. Behavioral and psychological barriers that impede behavior modification and disease prevention: role of behavior and prevention in maintaining health. Recommendations for behavior modification and disease prevention: factors promoting healthy living and factors promoting disease prevention. Use the GCU Library databases; include two to four outside scholarly resources for evidentiary support. Part 2: Behavioral Health Prevention Summary Report Write a summary report (1,250-1,500 words) about the information gleaned from the behavioral health prevention program design process. Include information on the program’s mission and vision, the stakeholders, behavior and psychological barriers, and recommendations for behavior modifications. Use two to three scholarly resources to support your explanations. For example, if you chose a specific program design or intervention does the literature support this as being an effective program? Was it successful and how do you know it was successful? Have other prevention programs found measureable outcomes that you plan to replicate? How does your program build on a successful program to target the community you’re serving? Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

Here are two situations that working journalists might face. Choose one and discuss what is involved in a way that demonstrates your knowledge of media law and ethics (5 PTS each) A. You are a political reporter. A candidate for the State Senate had a nervous breakdown ten years ago. The candidate’s opponent has slipped you a notarized hospital document confirming this fact. In an essay that demonstrates your journalism knowledge, discuss whether or not you should print the story and the legal and ethical reasons why. Include the factors involved, the risks if you don’t print it, and the risks if you do print it. B. Your friend is the lead singer of a rock group. Despite your objections, your editor insists that you review their performance tonight. But at the show, your friend is drunk; it’s obvious to everyone and it’s a terrible show. If you write an honest review, you could ruin his reputation. He asks you to come back the next night, when he promises to stay sober and do a great show. Explain what you would do and the legal and ethical factors that would influence your decision—why you should go, why you shouldn’t go, what you would ultimately write, and what the consequences could be.

Analyze why patients are sometimes reluctant to complain about their health care. What could be some reasons for the reluctance to complain? How can medical providers encourage patients to express concerns about their health care? How can confidence to complain be developed among patients?

One is writing guideline and requirements. Another is my writing and the professor’s review. Please revise my writing according to guideline and review. Including but not limited to: adding words, adding new topic paragraph if need, using clear “personal experience”, better using sources, adding other sources, etc. About the original source. The latter two sources may not be extended, but must be retained. ENGLISH 1100 – COMPOSITION I WRITING PROJECT 3: WRITING WITH RESEARCH – TOPIC GUIDELINES Word count: 1,500 (about 6 pages) Grade Value: 25% Sources to be used for Writing Project #3: • Your own ideas and experiences from either your Writing Project 1 (Writing from Personal Experience) to illustrate your ideas. Topic and purpose for Writing Project #3: Topic: Looking back on the experiences you described about a community problem in Writing Project 1 (Writing from Personal Experience). In Writing Project #3, you will formulate a claim about the question and argue that claim based on personal experience and fact-based evidence. Purpose: In Writing Project #3, your question—and the answer to that question—will reflect your stance (a “claim”) on the issue you’re addressing in your essay. You will formulate and argue the claim using source material that provides fact-based evidence, and you will illustrate your claim about the issue by using your own personal experience. What Writing Project #3 is not: WP#3 is not an informative essay or a “how-to” essay. You will not address the reader directly or use source material that offers “advice” to the reader. Your essay must argue a claim about an issue. Process for Developing Writing Project #3: Develop and organize your WP3 first version: Using your outline as a template, develop your ideas to create a WP3 first version: • Create an introduction: Refer to your experience you told a story about in Writing Project #1 then transition into the broader issue that this experience raised. Ask your “main” question about the community problem and provide a thesis that states your claim in answer to the question. • Develop supporting paragraphs (from your supporting points in your outline): Introduce each supporting paragraph with a topic sentence about a specific aspect of your claim that you want to explore. After each topic sentence, present information (from your own experience and ideas and from source material, correctly cited) that expands on idea in the topic sentence. • Write a conclusion: Refer back to your experiences in Writing Project 1 and reflect on your own experience and what you learned from your research that can help your community. • Format a works cited listing to include citations for the outside sources, formatted in MLA style. • Follow guidelines for development of ideas and use and citation of source material. Wp3 first versions that do not meet the minimum word requirement (1,500 words) and do not correctly use and cite sources both in-text and in the Works Cited listing will have points deducted. Write your final version of Writing Project 3 (100 points): Based on the comments of your peer review partner(s) and the instructor as well as your own ideas for revision, you will decide if you want to revise to create a WP3 final version. WP3 final versions that do not have correctly cited sources both in-text and in the Works Cited listing will not receive a passing grade; once a final version is submitted, you will not have an opportunity to revise.

The purpose of this assignment is to learn how to apply the t-test to a sample dataset. For this assignment, students will use IBM SPSS Statistics and the “Example Dataset.” Using the “Example Dataset” and SPSS, apply the t-test to assess the following statement: “Men and women have different incomes in this city.” Show your calculations and copy of the SPSS output in a Word document. In a separate 250-500 Word document, address the following questions: Describe what t-test is the most appropriate and explain why. Discuss whether you used a one-tailed or two-tailed test and explain why. Using SPSS, calculate the t-test and provide the test statistic and critical value assuming an alpha of .05. Calculate the effect size using r2. Interpret the results by (a) stating the reason the study or test was done, (b) presenting the main results, (c) explaining what the results mean, and (d) making suggestions for future research. Submit both Word documents to the instructor. APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

Managing in a Global Economy Case Study Analysis. Philips versus Matsushita: The Competitive Battle continues The article “CASE_4.3_PHILIPS_VERSUS_MATSUSHITA_THE_COMPETITIVE_BATTLE_CONTINUES” in the attachment, please read it. The Problems in the attachment also, please make sure you answer all the questions. NEED TO SUMBIT ON THE Turnitin. Will check similarity. Make sure you did your own work, use your own language to answer all the questions. Submission will be sent to Turnitin to be electronically reviewed for plagiarism.

Cooperative Learning Groups Research Design Exercise This exercise is designed to help you choose a research design for your proposal. Use your cooperative learning group to help you settle on a final design. I don’t expect anyone to be able to answer all of these questions right now. However, finding the answers to these questions will help guide your final proposal. Instructions Take 15–20 minutes and answer as many of the questions that follow as possible. You have answered some of these questions in the past; others will be new for you. Remember, it is okay for your research questions or design to change as you learn more about the feasibility of your evaluation. Questions you don’t feel comfortable with or are unsure about, leave blank and ask your cooperative learning group for help. 1. What is your research question? What are the major effective measures to support mental health program? 2. What is the outcome you are studying or what are the variables you are studying if it is not an outcome study?Better effectiveness in implementing mental health care program for individuals in the community. 3. Is this a qualitative or quantitative study? Does it have elements of both? Explain.This will be a Quantitative data in order to help one see the big picture of my research. 4. Is it a formative or summative evaluation? Explain. It will be a summative for me to be able to analyze my achievement in the end of my research. 5. What is the design of your study? What are the strengths of this design? What are the limitations? A case study design 6. From whom will you collect data? Staff members /co-workers 7. Will you use a sample? If so what is your sampling strategy? 8. What method will you use to collect the data (survey, interviews, administrative or secondary data, etc.)? Convenience 9. Are there any ethical or IRB issues with your study? After completing as many of these questions as possible, meet with your cooperative learning group. Each member of the group will present your research question(s) and summarize his or her design. Then, the presenting group member should share questions with which they are struggling. As a group, discuss next steps for the presenting member’s final research or evaluation proposal. We will discuss requirements for the final research proposal during next week’s session. In addition, provide the following feedback to each presenter: 1. If he or she has presented a design, identify one threat to the internal validity of the study (Remember, this does not mean you have to change your design, you just have to be aware of this limitation. All studies have limitations.). 2. Provide one suggestion for how you think the study can be improved or made more feasible.