Cheese company Place Analysis

Write a 750-1000 word analysis of “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality.” Be sure to address the following questions: Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? Explain. How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendation for action? What theory do you agree with? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action? Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. Case Study: Fetal Abnormality Jessica is a 30-year-old immigrant from Mexico City. She and her husband Marco have been in the U.S. for the last three years and have finally earned enough money to move out of their Aunt Maria’s home and into an apartment of their own. They are both hard workers. Jessica works 50 hours a week at a local restaurant and Marco has been contracting side jobs in construction. Six months before their move to an apartment, Jessica finds out she is pregnant. Four months later, Jessica and Marco arrive at the county hospital, a large, public, nonteaching hospital. A preliminary ultrasound indicates a possible abnormality with the fetus. Further scans are conducted and it is determined that the fetus has a rare condition in which it has not developed any arms, and will not likely develop them. There is also a 25% chance that the fetus may have Down syndrome. Dr. Wilson, the primary attending physician, is seeing Jessica for the first time, since she and Marco did not receive earlier prenatal care over concerns about finances. Marco insists that Dr. Wilson refrain from telling Jessica the scan results, assuring him that he will tell his wife himself when she is emotionally ready for the news. While Marco and Dr. Wilson are talking in another room, Aunt Maria walks into the room with a distressed look on her face. She can tell that something is wrong and inquires of Dr. Wilson. After hearing of the diagnosis, she walks out of the room wailing loudly and praying aloud. Marco and Dr. Wilson continue their discussion, and Dr. Wilson insists that he has an obligation to Jessica as his patient and that she has a right to know the diagnosis of the fetus. He furthermore is intent on discussing all relevant factors and options regarding the next step, including abortion. Marco insists on taking some time to think of how to break the news to Jessica, but Dr. Wilson, frustrated with the direction of the conversation, informs the husband that such a choice is not his to make. Dr. Wilson proceeds back across the hall, where he walks in on Aunt Maria awkwardly praying with Jessica and phoning the priest. At that point, Dr. Wilson gently but briefly informs Jessica of the diagnosis, and lays out the option for abortion as a responsible medical alternative, given the quality of life such a child would have. Jessica looks at him and struggles to hold back her tears. Jessica is torn between her hopes of a better socioeconomic position and increased independence, along with her conviction that all life is sacred. Marco will support Jessica in whatever decision she makes, but is finding it difficult not to view the pregnancy and the prospects of a disabled child as a burden and a barrier to their economic security and plans. Dr. Wilson lays out all of the options but clearly makes his view known that abortion is “scientifically” and medically a wise choice in this situation. Aunt Maria pleads with Jessica to follow through with the pregnancy and allow what “God intends” to take place, and urges Jessica to think of her responsibility as a mother. 70.0 %Content 25.0 %Determination of Moral Status Theory/Theories that determine the moral status of the fetus are incorrectly identified. Theory/Theories are identified that determine the moral status of the fetus for at least a few of the people listed in the case study, but explanation is lacking. Theory/Theories are identified that determine the moral status of the fetus for at least a few of the people listed in the case study. Some explanation is provided. Theory/Theories are identified that determine the moral status of the fetus for all of the people listed in the case study, including adequate explanation. Theory/Theories are identified that determine the moral status of the fetus for all of the people listed in the case study, including a detailed explanation. 25.0 %Recommendation for Action Recommendation for action shows little to no relevance to the case study. Recommendation for action is present, but lacks explanation. Recommendation for action is present, with some explanation. Recommendation for action is present, with explanation. Recommendation for action is present, with detailed explanation that shows a deep understanding of the subject. 20.0 %Personal Response to Case Study Personal response to the case study shows little to no relevance, and does not detail how the theory determines or influences the recommendation for action. Personal response to case study includes if you agree or disagree but does not detail how the theory determines or influences the recommendation for action. Personal response to case study includes if you agree or disagree and an explanation on how the theory determines or influences the recommendation for action. Personal response to case study includes if you agree or disagree and a detailed explanation on how the theory determines or influences the recommendation for action. Personal response to case study includes if you agree or disagree and a detailed explanation that shows a deep understanding of the subject including how the theory determines or influences the recommendation for action. 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 10.0 %Format 5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. 5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. 100 %Total Weightage

Do it in google docs 1. Title page is required 2. Show calculation and formula the solution 3. There should be dollar sign,% One answer and one page. Page 1 of 7 COMM 293_Winter_2020 AC Final_Part_II Instructions  You have 48 hours to complete and submit this part of your final exam  There is 6 questions for 70% of your final exam  The title page is a requirement  You are supposed to answer the questions on your own  Any reference to any kind of open sources will trigger the academic consequences  For all questions please show all your calculation, starting with the formula, then – calculation, then – solution  In calculations the signs as $, %, etc. should accompany the figures, e.g. $40, 15%, 3.5 times  Neither, Excel skills, nor writing style (APA or Chicago) will be awarded any marks  Please make sure that the submitted material fit into the pages  Start answering each question from the new page  Fit only ONE ANSWER –the table – to ONE PAGE  No bonus marks will be awarded for the early submission READ THE QUESTION CAREFULLY AND ANSWER WHAT IS ASKED Page 2 of 7 Question I {15 marks} Balloon production Corp. purchased equipment on March 1, 2018 for $70,000. The company estimated the equipment would have a useful life of three years and produce 12,000 units in three years, with a salvage value of $10,000. During 2018, the equipment produced 4,900 units. On November 30, 2019, the equipment was sold for $18,000 after producing 5,600 units that year. Required a. Record all the necessary transactions for the year ended December 2018 and 2019, using the following depreciation methods: i. Straight line, ii. Double-declining balance, and iii. Units-of-production. b. Complete the following schedule for each method of depreciation. Round to the whole month. Page 3 of 7 Question II {15 marks} The December 31, 2020 equity section of Team Inc.`s balance sheet appears below: Team Inc. Equity section of the balance sheet December 31, 2020 Contributed capital Preferred shares, $3.75 cumulative, 40,000 shares authorized and issued $ 1,660,000 Preferred shares, $10 non-cumulative, 8,000 shares authorized and issued 670,000 Common shares, 400,000 authorised and issued 1,750,000 Total contributed capital $ 4,080,000 Retained earnings 741,600 Total equity $ 4,821,600 All the shares were issued on January 01, 2018, when the corporation began operations. No dividends had been declared during the first two years of operations, 2018 and 2019. During 2020, the cash dividends declared and paid totaled $613,300. Required 1. In a table form calculate the amount of cash dividends paid during 2020 to each of three classes of shares. 2. Assuming profit earned during 2020 was $1,250,000, determine the December 31, 2019 balance in retaining earnings. 3. Prepare a statement of changes in equity for the year ended December 31, 2020. Page 4 of 7 Question III {10 marks} Trolley Corp. reported $1,445,710 of profit for 2020. On November 02, 2020 it declared and paid the annual preferred dividends of $155,000. On January 01, 2020 Trolley had 80,000 and 240,000 outstanding preferred and common shares, respectively. The following transactions changed the number of shares outstanding during the year: Feb. 01 Declared and issued a 20% common share dividend Apr. 30 Sold 135,000 common shares for cash May 01 Sold 50,000 preferred shares for cash Oct. 31 Sold 30,000 common shares for cash Required a. Calculate the amount of profit available for distribution to the common shareholders b. In a table calculate the weighted-average number of common shares for the year c. Calculate the earnings per share for the year Page 5 of 7 Question IV {10 marks} Kitten Investment corp. issued $700,000 of 6%, six-year bonds for $735,902 on July 01, 2020, the day the bonds were dated. The market interest rate was 5%. Interest is paid semiannually beginning December 31, 2020. Kitten uses the effective interest method to amortise bond discounts and premiums. Required Record: a. The issuance of the bonds, b. The first interest payment. Page 6 of 7 Question V {10 marks} Mount Corp. was organized on January 02, 2020. And issued 50,000 common shares for $250,000 on that date. The following investment transactions and events subsequently occurred: 2020 Jan. 12 Mount Corp. acquired 12,000 shares of Hill Ltd. At a cost of $250,000. The investment represented 24% of Hill`s outstanding shares Mar. 31 Hill Ltd. declared and paid a cash dividend of $1.00 per share Dec. 31 Hill Ltd. announced that it`s profit for 2020 was $125,000 2021 Aud. 15 Hill Ltd. declared and paid a cash dividend of $.80 per share Dec. 31 Hill Ltd. announced that it`s loss for 2021 was $95,000 2022 Jan. 06 Mount Corp. sold all of its investment in Hill Ltd. for $230,000 Assume that Mount Corp. has significant influence over Hill Ltd. with its 24% share. Required 1. Present the entries to record the preceding transactions in Mount Corp.`s books 2. Calculate the carrying value per share of Mount Corp.`s investment as reflected in the investment account on January 01, 2022 Page 7 of 7 Question VI {10 marks} Required Use the following income statement and information about changes in non-cash current assets and current liabilities to present the cash flows from operating activities using the indirect method: Earring Co. Income statement For year ended May 31, 2020 Sales $2,810 Cost of goods sold 1,419 Gross profit $1,391 Operating expenses Depreciation expense $223 Other expenses 1,100 Total operating expenses $1,323 Loss on sale of long-term investment 89 Net income (Net loss) from operation $(21) Income tax expense 0 Net income (Net loss) $(21) Changes in current assets and current liability accounts during the year were as follows: Accounts receivable $63 decrease Inventory 25 increase Prepaid insurance 3 increase Accounts payable 15 increase Accrued liabilities 8 decrease The end of the exam

Please follow the instructions from the attachment and complete the project using Fathom 2 as an assistance. The instructions for what to do with Fathom: Use Fathom and the data set to create 5 interesting graphs, either showing a high correlation (in particular if you did not expect one) or a correlation close to zero (when you would have expected a higher one). (Graph tool) Create a summary table for a single attribute, and one for two attributes. (Preferably ones that you used in the graphs above. Write two paragraphs on what you observed, and then ask questions you would be interested in having answered. (Use text tool)

It is me again. This time, i need some help to write an About Me page (i have previous written three examples differently, so you can have some content when writing it). This is an English course, where the grades will be given based on English Hooks, Branding, Tone, Voice (e.g. when you write the course you studied, you need to also include something like what is the purpose you pick that course). Anyway i will list down the requirements below, and attach a copy of my About Me so you can use the content. Oh yah, i need this before 21 February, please help me out, i just need around 200-220 words. Title: Create an action-packed About page Requirement 1. Tell your story in about 200 words. You can either revise one of your draft, or write a new “about me” story. 2. Feel free to add quotes about yourself from a family member or friends if you wished. 3. This is an About Page, but also “My story” 4. At this point, you’re probably thinking about how your personal description can be made more visually engaging as an About page on your site. 5. At the end of the day, this About Me story will be posted on a website. 6. Grade will be based both on (a) how well you revise your written description and (b) whether your visual layout is attractive and a good match for your story. Writing Goal: Turn your personal description into a capsule story for your About page. In this story of your life, convey only the most relevant details and (perhaps) a few fun quirks and twists. Design Goal: We’ve asked you to add a photo of yourself, but consider adding other images as well. Also, think about other ways to make the layout attractive: subheadings, pullquotes, or highlighed text blocks. Hint: If you add an interview quote from a friend or family member, that’s a good chance to try out a different text format.

OUTLINE FOR PAPER What is the name of the artist who created the artwork? 2. What kind of an artwork is it? 3. What medium does it appear to be made from? 4. What is the name of the artwork? 5. When was this artwork created? 6. Where was this artwork created? 7. Name some other major events or developments in history that occurred during the same time this artwork was created. 8. List all the literal objects you see in the composition (trees, people, animals, shapes, mountains, etc.). 9. Consider the significant art elements that are present in this artwork and describe them: 10. Discuss how the artist manipulated the art elements to create the following principles: a. Balance b. scale c. Unity d. Variety e. Emphasis f. Rhythm 2 g. Movement Interpretation Interpretation 11. What do you think the artist was trying to say though this art piece? 12. Why do you think the artist created this artwork? 13. Describe any additional meanings you think the artists might have intended. 14. What feelings do you have when looking at this artwork? 15. Do you think there are things in the artwork that represent other things – symbols? Colors? Objects? What? Evaluation Make sure to justify your opinions. 16. Do you like this artwork? Why? 17. Do you think this artwork is “good” or “bad”? Why? 3 18. Do think this is an important work? To whom do you think it would be important? Why? 19. Would display this artwork in your home? Should it be in a museum? Why? 20. Is there something about this work of art that you think should have been done differently? What and Why?

The purpose of this assignment is to practice calculating confidence intervals. For this assignment, students will utilize Excel and SPSS Statistics and the “Example Dataset.” Using the “Example Dataset,” complete the following: Based on a normal distribution curve, calculate the probability of an individual being 60 years or older in this population. Show the Excel and SPSS formulas or your hand calculations. Include screenshots as needed to illustrate this. Using the sample standard deviation of age as an estimate of the population standard deviation, calculate by hand the standard error of the mean. Show your calculations and the answer. Calculate by hand a 95% confidence interval for “Age” based on the sample mean. Use SPSS to verify your answer. Include your calculations and screenshots of the SPSS output. Interpret the confidence interval for age and explain the three pieces of information needed to calculate a confidence interval. Submit one Word document that includes all of the assignment deliverables. APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Topic: Harlem Renaissance Instructions: Write an essay about the Harlem Rennaisance and how this era have paved way for the enlightenment and resistance from oppression. 25% – Thesis Statement that develops the three main ideas from the prompt (five paragraphs in all) 25% – Includes one quote per body paragraph (must follow MLA guidelines for parenthetical citations). Write a five-paragraph essay that shows how black Americans dealt with oppression, disillusionment, and inequality during the Harlem Renaissance. In your essay, include information from one or more of the readings covered this semester in each paragraph and clearly connect the characters and conflicts to the issues regarding black Americans during the period of Modernism

Think about what is the theme/point behind the story of: “A Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe Please incorporate The Elements of Fiction and please use New Criticism to interpret the story of “A Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe Avoid any and all summary sites within your essay and use MLA format and citations in this essay. Please make sure your essay has a clear introduction and thesis statement (topic plus point about that topic) at the bottom of your introduction. Please introduce your chosen short story in your introduction. Make sure your body paragraphs are focus on proving your thesis statement-theme of the story. Please make sure to have a conclusion that does not bring in new information. Use literary present and third person in your essay.

Review Essays In a review essay you identify the author’s thesis, method, sources and argument and also offer a critique of the argument. Does it convince you? If so why? If not why not? Pay close attention to how the scholar uses evidence to support an argument. Review essays help us build our own personal food studies library.

Hi, Please read the instructions for this assignment below. Please let me know which topic would you like to write about. The books we read so far including The Iliad and The Odyssey both by Homer, The Oresteia, Genesis, Job, and Sappho if not, winter. I would personally recommend to write The Iliad or odyssey. I must show proof of attendance to the Museum. You can find pictures online and please let me know which museum in NYC and topic did you pick then I will go there and take a picture of the one you write to show attendance. I would greatly appreciate it! just like the last assignment you did, do not use many big or really complicated words, but the ideas and structure of the essay must be super CLEAR. Thank you Want to ignore historical context and focus on your experience and your own analysis of the cultural piece. You may want to consider your own experience at the museum or theatrical event. And. discuss how this experience reshaped your interpretation or relationship to a text(s) we read this past semester. (Museum: what pieces were around it? Was the piece displayed as part of a theme, historical period, or an artist’s work? How did that shape your interaction with it? Theater: what was the production like? The sets? Costumes? The spectacle?) It is up to you. and there are many other ways you can approach this writing piece. OPTION TWO: For option two. discuss the connection between your creation and a text we read. You might approach this like a book review or artist exhibit review in a newspaper, discussing the major themes you sought to develop. Or. you might reflect on the process of making your work – what choices did you make in crafting your poetry/music/film etc.? Why? What inspired you initially from the original work that led to your creation? How did the process of creating this work make you appreciate a new aspect of the texts we read or the authors who wrote them? Again, it is up to you. and there are many other ways you can approach this writing piece. 1 Core in Contemporary Culture Due: Nov 8th1.1 The Core and Contemporary Culture Assignment: This assignment asks you to be creative and connect the literature we have read this semester to contemporary culture. You must submit 2-3 page writing assignment. 1) One option is that you may select a piece of NYC based western visual art. theater or film and examine them in conjunction with a piece of literature from this semester. These may be found through a visit to the Metropolitan Museum of Art or attendance of a performance (theater, poetiy. dance, etc.) in NYC. Write an analysis examining the piece/pieces you chose to discuss, relating them to the literature we have read, and how the engagement with the pieces you chose makes you think reflect understand the literature we have read this semester. As creativity is a component of the assignment, be selective in picking what you want to write about. 2) Alternatively, you may develop your own creative project (visual art. theater, poetiy. dialogue, letter). In addition to submitting your piece, you must write an analysis explaining how your work interprets and relates to literature we have read. Grading of this assignment will be based to some degree on creativity but mostly on your ability to present a clear, organized piece of writing that demonstrates an engagement with the text. DUE: The written assignments are due 11/9. In addition to submitting your written piece, you must show proof of attendance (photos of tickets or attendance/selected pieces) that may be submitted via email. For those of you going on the Met Tour. be creative in your selection of what work you want to use for your assignment. You may want to pick a piece not discussed on the torn- itself. You are welcome to go to the Met on your own time and pick a piece. **It is not necessary to construct an argument in the way that you do for the analytic essays. However, your essay, should be organized, and an argument or at least a clear introduction explaining the piece that you selected or created and its connection to the text(s) this past semester, may be helpful. I would also encourage you to make the connection between the cultural piece and what you saw obvious. Show engagement both with the text we read this past semester and draw connections between the text and the cultural piece you chose. You should cite or reference the text as needed. OPTION ONE: If you are doing option ONE. you have a variety of options. You may want to consider the historical context in which the cultural piece you selected was created.