Choreography Videos: Ohad Naharin, Crystal Pite, and William Forsythe

Develop a presentation no longer than 10-12 minutes, with comprehensive speaker’s notes, that covers all of the major areas of your proposal. on Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Police scholars offer that police reform is inherently political reform. Please explain this statement and give two examples as to what it will take to bring about real reform in the police service.

Change Proposal Technology has been credited with contributing to a safer patient environment. Create a change proposal for a new technology that will contribute to a safer patient environment. Examine human factors including resistance to change into the expanded use of informatics. Be sure to include how your proposed change will impact patient safety, how you will measure the impact of your change, and how you will communicate and implement this change. Submissions Details: Submit your response in a 3- to 5-page Microsoft Word document. APA 6th edition needed. Turnitin has to be below 30% Grading ruburic Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D Range) (17-19) 19 points Satisfactory (C Range) (20-22) 22 points Proficient (B Range) (22-25) 25 points Exemplary (A Range) (25-28) 28 points Summarized how proposal will impact patient safety. Student did not submit assignment Did not summarized how proposal will impact patient safety, or the details are vague or nonexistent. Summarized how proposal will impact patient safety, but there is a lack of detail. Summarized how proposal will impact patient safety. Explanations were good but could be more detailed. Thoroughly summarized how proposal will impact patient safety. / 28 This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D Range) (17-19) 19 points Satisfactory (C Range) (20-22) 22 points Proficient (B Range) (22-25) 25 points Exemplary (A Range) (25-28) 28 points Summarized how impact of change will be measured. Student did not submit assignment Did not summarized how impact of change will be measured or the details are vague or nonexistent. Summarized how impact of change will be measured, but there is a lack of detail. Summarized how impact of change will be measured. Explanations were good but could be more detailed. Summarized how impact of change will be measured. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas. / 28 This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D Range) (19-22) 22 points Satisfactory (C Range) (22-25) 25 points Proficient (B Range) (26-28) 28 points Exemplary (A Range) (29-32) 32 points Summarized a communication strategy. Student did not submit assignment Did not summarized a communication strategy, or the details are vague or nonexistent. Summarized a communication strategy, but there is a lack of detail. Summarized a communication strategy. Explanations were good but could be more detailed. Summarized a communication strategy. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas. / 32 This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D Range) (19-22) 22 points Satisfactory (C Range) (22-25) 25 points Proficient (B Range) (26-28) 28 points Exemplary (A Range) (29-32) 32 points Examined the human factors including resistance to change. Student did not submit assignment Did not examine the human factors including resistance to change, or the details are vague or nonexistent. Examined the human factors including resistance to change, but there is a lack of detail. Examined the human factors including resistance to change. Explanations were good but could be more detailed. Examined the human factors including resistance to change. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas. / 32 This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria No Submission 0 points Emerging (F through D Range) (12-14) 14 points Satisfactory (C Range) (14-16) 16 points Proficient (B Range) (16-18) 18 points Exemplary (A Range) (18-20) 20 points Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Student did not submit assignment Did not write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; nor demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation, but there is a lack of details. Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Explanations were good but could be more detailed. Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas. / 20 Rubric Total Score Total / 140 Overall Score Overall Score No Submission0 points minimum Emerging (F through D Range)96 points minimum Satisfactory (C Range)110 points minimum Proficient (B Range)124 points minimum Exemplary (A Range)140 points minimum

Case Study: Boutique Hotels Read the Boutique Hotels case study on pages 100 – 101 of your textbook, and answer the three questions at the end. 1. What are the operational challenges associated with developing new boutique hotels? 2. What can we learn from the mass customization of tangible goods that can be applied to the mass customization of services (boutique hotels)? 3. How can boutique hotels maintain a consistent/ standard level of service without compromising their unique/ personalized service mission?

FINAL PAPER: A single image of fashionable dress, as defined by the focus of this course, will serve as the basis for exploration and analysis of both historical style and the image itself. The image both guides and focuses the paper: a successful paper consistently analyzes the period and each category through the original image. Each paper will address somewhat different topics, but for the most part will consider cultural context, designer, artist, model, materiality, etc. This assignment builds upon the skills developed in Integrative Design Studio and Seminar. Due dates are staggered throughout the semester; each component is graded separately (late work and plagiarism policies in effect for each part). Papers are to be five pages; length assumes Times New Roman or similar font (12 points) or 250 words per page, double-spaced, with a one-inch margin on all sides, and additional footnotes, illustrations, and bibliography, with formal academic structure and language. Spelling and grammar, as well as Parsons-mandated formatting (Chicago Manual of Style, Turabian, 16th edition), will be counted toward your final grade, as well as quality and number (minimum six) of sources.

Week 2: Measurement One of the keystone concepts in modern quality improvement science is that of measurement. An often heard management adage is “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it.” Measurement can come in many different forms, including statistics, charts, and patient satisfaction surveys. This week we begin to explore measurement in health care quality improvement, and we will be introduced to various tools used for measurement. Learning Objectives Students will: Analyze an example of quality that was measured, assessed, and improved Apply simple data collection techniques to a measurement problem Design a data collection mechanism for an aspect of quality Interpret a control chart Synthesize the purpose, methods, and findings from the evidence-based literature that relate to a practice problem Photo Credit: [Anthia Cumming]/[E+]/Getty Images Learning Resources Required Readings Spath, P. (2013). Introduction to healthcare quality management (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press. Chapter 3, “Measuring Performance” (pp. 32–72) Chapter 4, “Evaluating Performance” (pp. 73–110) Yoder-Wise, P. S. (2015). Leading and managing in nursing (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby. Chapter 20, “Managing Quality and Risk” (pp. 361–381) Chapter 21, “Translating Research Into Practice” (pp. 383–404) Perla, R. J., Provost, L. P., & Murray, S. K. (2011). The run chart: A simple analytical tool for learning from variation in healthcare processes. BMJ Quality and Safety, 20(1), 46–51. Retrieved from http://www(dot)med(dot)unc(dot)edu/cce/files/education-training/The%20run%20chart%20a%20simple%20analytical%20tool.pdf Discussion: Applying Measurement Tools One example of a measurement tool is the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) comprehensive care measures. Review the eight components of HEDIS comprehensive diabetes care; then consider the following scenario. You are a staff nurse working in a private primary care practice. It is a small practice with 2 MDs (internists), 2 nurses, 1 medical assistant, and an office staff for billing. There are approximately 1,000 patients in the practice. You have had no EHR until the last year, but all charts are manual, historically. Your physicians are starting to inquire about quality incentives, particularly regarding patients with diabetes. By Day 3 Take on the role of the staff nurse in the scenario, and post an explanation of how you would go about finding out how many diabetics are in your practice and how many meet all 8 components of HEDIS comprehensive diabetes care. Support your response with references from the professional nursing literature. Your posts need to be written at the capstone level (see checklist). Notes Initial Post: This should be a 3-paragraph (at least 350 words) response. Be sure to use evidence from the readings and include in-text citations. Utilize essay-level writing practice and skills, including the use of transitional material and organizational frames. Avoid quotes; paraphrase to incorporate evidence into your own writing. A reference list is required. Use the most current evidence (usually ≤ 5 years old). (Refer to AWE Checklist, Capstone) By Day 7 Read two or more of your colleagues’ postings from the Discussion question. Respond to two or more of your colleagues’ postings with a critique of their data mechanisms. Explain whether the data mechanism is practical, how long it might take, any alternatives you might suggest, and/or any electronic data collection possibilities that might apply. Post a Discussion entry on three different days of the week. See the Discussion Rubric found in the Course Information area. Submission and Grading Information Grading Criteria To access your rubric: Week 2 Discussion Rubric Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 7 To participate in this Discussion: Week 2 Discussion

Readings for Section B: Friedman, T. L. (2017). “Chapter Two: What the Hell Happened in 2007” in Thank You for Being Late: An Optimist’s Guide to Thriving in the Age of Accelerations . Picador/Farrar Straus and Giroux.ActionsHarari, Y. (2018). “Chapter Four: Equality” in 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. New York: Random House.Actions 10. The World is Flat was published in 2005. Once Tom Friedman finished the book he thought he would be able to return to the business of being a journalist, comfortable with the ‘framework’ that he had established. Then 2007 happened and challenged his thinking. How does he explain how the year 2007 altered his “view of how the Machine worked” in his chapter “What the Hell Happened in 2007”?[I encourage you to consult a number of sources when developing your answer. For instance, Tom Friedman’s MIT Compton Lecture (Links to an external site.) [Fall 2018] and his discussion with Yuval Harari “How To Understand Our Times” (Links to an external site.) might be of utility, not just as substance for this and the following questions, but also as useful prompts to consider your own thinking on various ‘questions of our day’).] 11) Friedman draws attention to the following graph (Astro Teller graph) in his chapter “What the Hell Happened in 2007”. 11. Please explain what “we are here” actually means in this graph and using both the writings of Friedman and Harari please outline several risks of being in this position on the graph (Please be thorough with your explanation). 12. Citing Teller, Friedman argues that we are all going to need to learn the “bicycle trick”. What does he mean by this metaphor?

This week you will begin work on your final project. Your final project will be counted as your final exam and will consist of preparing a Global Business Plan. A link to the outline is provided below: This class strives to provide you with papers/projects that relate to real-world expectations. You will first choose a product or service (not both) and one country. This plan is specifically written for one product or service and one country – no comparison or contrasting! After you have read the guidelines, write a few paragraphs which summarize your final project idea. Submit this by the normal time on Monday but earlier would be better! Please contact me if you have any questions regarding a product/service and/or a country of choice. Take Note: for this assignment, you need to select a topic and country selection. This is for a new market entry, for a product or service, that does not yet exist in that market. This is not research of an existing product. iPhone already exists in the US and globally(WRONG). The country selection should be a country you are not familiar. Also, the product/service you select should ultimately meet the needs of the consumers in that market. If you would like to select the iPhone 12 PRO, I need you to select and profile a country where it does not yet exist.

Please summarize part one case study of my document.

Give an example of how you have used the communication accommodation theory in intercultural interaction. Did you use convergence, maintenance, or divergence? Why? Would you change anything about the interaction considering your knowledge of this theory?