Discussion Questions.CRJ320 Interviewing and Interrogating

Essay on Pride and Prejudice, by Jane Austen Has to be exactly 1500 words, no fewer and not many more The topic of the Essay: The very first sentence of the book Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen, though it seems to focus on men, raises the question: what about the women in the novel, the prospective wives of these men “in want of a wife”? If such a single man “must be in want of a wife,” what is a single woman in want of, when it comes to marriage? In light of this first sentence of Pride and Prejudice, discuss the situation, attitude, and actions of the following four women in the book, with regard to courtship and marriage: Elizabeth Bennet, Charlotte Lucas, Jane Bennet, and Lydia Bennet. Remember to talk about each of the four women in four different paragraphs, meaning one paragraph per woman. Consider the two meanings of the word “want,” the thinking of the women about marriage, and their situation with respect to social position and “fortune.” Concentrate on the most interesting cases, while considering secondary characters as they shed light on the main cases. In looking briefly at secondary characters, you might consider those men and women who are not engaged or married at novel’s end. Notice, then, the explicit mention of a “good fortune.” What about a man without a good fortune? Does the possession of a good fortune matter in the case of the women? And a further consideration: although the main focus of the novel would seem to be on courtship leading to marriage, you might briefly consider a couple of cases where a couple has already been married, briefly or for a longer time: Charlotte and Collins (the only couple we see in both courtship and marriage), the elder Lucas’s, the Bennet’s, the Gardiners. Make sure that your essay has a clear thesis and a title that indicates the focus of your discussion.

Course Group Proposal You have recently been asked to lead a group. You can creatively develop the group from one of the following general themes: adult – a group addressing Family relationships with mental illness Identify the age range *(18 and up) of the people in the group. Consider the group dynamics in terms of emotional maturity as well as chronological age. Play the role as if you were the leader. Identify the concerns you might have and the issues you may face leading the group. Groups Gladding a counseling specialty 7th edition Samuel T Gladding This is the Book I use for the course just in case its needed

The purpose of this assignment is to practice calculating confidence intervals. For this assignment, students will utilize Excel and SPSS Statistics and the “Example Dataset.” Using the “Example Dataset,” complete the following: Based on a normal distribution curve, calculate the probability of an individual being 60 years or older in this population. Show the Excel and SPSS formulas or your hand calculations. Include screenshots as needed to illustrate this. Using the sample standard deviation of age as an estimate of the population standard deviation, calculate by hand the standard error of the mean. Show your calculations and the answer. Calculate by hand a 95% confidence interval for “Age” based on the sample mean. Use SPSS to verify your answer. Include your calculations and screenshots of the SPSS output. Interpret the confidence interval for age and explain the three pieces of information needed to calculate a confidence interval. Submit one Word document that includes all of the assignment deliverables. APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Need to complete a career plan ppt, which includes some thoughts on previous and future careers, and resume can be provided as a reference.

According to Charles Kindleberger, an economic historian, asset price bubbles have occurred across a wide variety of countries and time periods. The bubbles of the last 100 years have predominantly been focused on real estate, stocks, and foreign investment. Find out more about the asset bubble “1970s: The surge in loans to Mexico and other developing economies”. (There will be plagiarism check so use your own words, and then: 1. Tell the story of this bubble using the models in section 7.1.6 from the attached file. 2. Explain the relevance to your story, if any, of the arguments in the ‘Do bubbles exist?’ fragment from the attached file about the existence of bubbles. Please read all of the readings in the attached files, there is useful information.

– Please carefully read the assignment handout！(In the attachment files) – Especially the red highlight part! You must do the reading and don’t use any outside resources. Carefully read all the sources(attach files) I give u and remember cite please. You must read the sources which are: (In the attachment files) 1. God’s Commandments to the Israelites 2. Caroline Books 3. Andreas Karlstadt, “On the Removal of Images” (1521) (pp. 21-25) 4.Virtual Textbook: Icons and Iconoclasm in Byzantium https://www(dot)metmuseum(dot)org/toah/hd/icon/hd_icon.htm 5. Panofsky_Iconography and Iconology Those are the sources that you can use in the essay, and u better apply or connect the idea in the essay to show the understanding of the sources. You can search other resources to help you understanding but please don’t cite in my essay. Thanks! Aniconism and Iconoclasm: 400-word essay Due: Friday October 23 @11:00am Up until now we have encountered three moments in which the use of images has been debated within the monotheistic religions. Judaism was profoundly aniconic, without images of its God, and banned images entirely, as did Islam. Christianity ultimately embraced images of its God (and other holy figures, the Virgin and Saints above all), but not without extensive debate, with a strong opposition party supporting a ban on images in the 8th century. In the 16th century, the Lutheran and Calvinist Reformation reopened that debate. Calvinists removed all images from their churches, while Lutherans settled on a lesser role of images. The Roman church, henceforth Catholicism, however completely embraced the use of images. This assignment asks you to look at one side of the debates (the position taken AGAINST images), primarily in Christianity. Iconoclasm is the destruction of images. Therefore, iconoclasm was the enactment of a policy against images, many, many of which populated the altars and walls of Christian churches since the time the Western Church officially embraced images. Iconoclasm, or the destruction of images, is an action that often followed the debates over the question: should there be images of the Christian God and Saints, or should there be no images? The primary sources that you are reading for this assignment discuss their aniconic policies, not the iconoclasm that arose from them. To Do List: Read: （Please Please you must read before writing/ only use the sources I gave u ） The Torah (Old Testament): selected passages of God’s Commandments to the Israelites (this was assigned reading in Week 4) Iconoclasm debates of the 8th-9th centuries CE in the Christian Church: excerpt from the Caroline Books Debates of the 16th century that divided the Roman Church into Reformed and Catholic confessions: excerpt from Andreas Karlstadt, “On the Removal of Images” (1521) (pp. 21-25). Karlstadt was a Reform theologian of the early 16th century who advocated the extreme position of disallowing images in the churches. Write: 400 words In your essay analyze the different reasons the writers of the three texts give to reject images of the Jewish God (in the case of the Torah, or Old Testament) and the Christian God( in the case of the Caroline Books and in the treatise of Karlstadt); further, discuss the overlap and distinctions between the concepts of damnatio memoriae and iconoclasm. Proofread, read out loud Format: 12 point type, Times Roman Font, Double-spaced. Chicago Style citations. Submit: On Quercus “Writing Assignment #2 Iconoclasm”. Attach the completed and signed Academic Integrity form. Note: Acceptable file formats: doc, docx, pdf. Also helpful: Virtual Textbook: Icons and Iconoclasm in Byzantium https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/icon/hd_icon.htm

Seongsook Choi and Keith Richards posit that a large majority of interdisciplinary research is “epistemologically oriented, depending on a degree of boundary crossing for its success” (52). Aside from the assignments you have completed for this class, what interdisciplinary research have you undertaken in your career thus far? What boundaries did you cross to undertake the research and how did you define them? In your experience, has interdisciplinary problem solving led to positive outcomes?（It is discussion board so just write what you want to write and my major is psychology）

This assignment is a little bit different, please see below: TOPIC: [Public Sphere (including Opinion Leadership) and Affinity Space on Twitter that related to adult learning and education.] 1.Read About HGSE first, we are doing this project for HGSE 2.Read SWOT and Research Proposal_draft2 to get a sense of what our theories are. 3.Read Paper Outline_Draft CURRENT for our current literate review, and follow the comments to do revision(there are 9 of them) 4.The total length of the changes is two pages, which can be made on the original article or in a separate file

Write a 750-1000 word analysis of “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality.” Be sure to address the following questions: Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? Explain. How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendation for action? What theory do you agree with? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action? Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. Case Study: Fetal Abnormality Jessica is a 30-year-old immigrant from Mexico City. She and her husband Marco have been in the U.S. for the last three years and have finally earned enough money to move out of their Aunt Maria’s home and into an apartment of their own. They are both hard workers. Jessica works 50 hours a week at a local restaurant and Marco has been contracting side jobs in construction. Six months before their move to an apartment, Jessica finds out she is pregnant. Four months later, Jessica and Marco arrive at the county hospital, a large, public, nonteaching hospital. A preliminary ultrasound indicates a possible abnormality with the fetus. Further scans are conducted and it is determined that the fetus has a rare condition in which it has not developed any arms, and will not likely develop them. There is also a 25% chance that the fetus may have Down syndrome. Dr. Wilson, the primary attending physician, is seeing Jessica for the first time, since she and Marco did not receive earlier prenatal care over concerns about finances. Marco insists that Dr. Wilson refrain from telling Jessica the scan results, assuring him that he will tell his wife himself when she is emotionally ready for the news. While Marco and Dr. Wilson are talking in another room, Aunt Maria walks into the room with a distressed look on her face. She can tell that something is wrong and inquires of Dr. Wilson. After hearing of the diagnosis, she walks out of the room wailing loudly and praying aloud. Marco and Dr. Wilson continue their discussion, and Dr. Wilson insists that he has an obligation to Jessica as his patient and that she has a right to know the diagnosis of the fetus. He furthermore is intent on discussing all relevant factors and options regarding the next step, including abortion. Marco insists on taking some time to think of how to break the news to Jessica, but Dr. Wilson, frustrated with the direction of the conversation, informs the husband that such a choice is not his to make. Dr. Wilson proceeds back across the hall, where he walks in on Aunt Maria awkwardly praying with Jessica and phoning the priest. At that point, Dr. Wilson gently but briefly informs Jessica of the diagnosis, and lays out the option for abortion as a responsible medical alternative, given the quality of life such a child would have. Jessica looks at him and struggles to hold back her tears. Jessica is torn between her hopes of a better socioeconomic position and increased independence, along with her conviction that all life is sacred. Marco will support Jessica in whatever decision she makes, but is finding it difficult not to view the pregnancy and the prospects of a disabled child as a burden and a barrier to their economic security and plans. Dr. Wilson lays out all of the options but clearly makes his view known that abortion is “scientifically” and medically a wise choice in this situation. Aunt Maria pleads with Jessica to follow through with the pregnancy and allow what “God intends” to take place, and urges Jessica to think of her responsibility as a mother. 70.0 %Content 25.0 %Determination of Moral Status Theory/Theories that determine the moral status of the fetus are incorrectly identified. Theory/Theories are identified that determine the moral status of the fetus for at least a few of the people listed in the case study, but explanation is lacking. Theory/Theories are identified that determine the moral status of the fetus for at least a few of the people listed in the case study. Some explanation is provided. Theory/Theories are identified that determine the moral status of the fetus for all of the people listed in the case study, including adequate explanation. Theory/Theories are identified that determine the moral status of the fetus for all of the people listed in the case study, including a detailed explanation. 25.0 %Recommendation for Action Recommendation for action shows little to no relevance to the case study. Recommendation for action is present, but lacks explanation. Recommendation for action is present, with some explanation. Recommendation for action is present, with explanation. Recommendation for action is present, with detailed explanation that shows a deep understanding of the subject. 20.0 %Personal Response to Case Study Personal response to the case study shows little to no relevance, and does not detail how the theory determines or influences the recommendation for action. Personal response to case study includes if you agree or disagree but does not detail how the theory determines or influences the recommendation for action. Personal response to case study includes if you agree or disagree and an explanation on how the theory determines or influences the recommendation for action. Personal response to case study includes if you agree or disagree and a detailed explanation on how the theory determines or influences the recommendation for action. Personal response to case study includes if you agree or disagree and a detailed explanation that shows a deep understanding of the subject including how the theory determines or influences the recommendation for action. 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 10.0 %Format 5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. 5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. 100 %Total Weightage

Is myth meant to be a substitute for science? If so, are we currently living in a post-mythic world? Responses to essay questions should argue for a specific academic viewpoint Primary evidence from the text must be used to support analysis Warning: Do not simply narrate the texts with no analysis Citations are not necessary i will attach a list of the stories you may use for evidence please only use these stories and cite them well List of stories- these are stories we read in class. Just use examples from these stories you do not need to quote and use citations Morford, M.P.O., Lenardon, R.J., & Sham, M. 2014. ‘Interpretation and Definition of Classical Mythology.’ Classical Mythology. 10th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dalley 228-249 Dalley 249-274 Inca creation story African-Yoruba creation story Metamorphosis Prose Edda Greece- Theogony Mesopotamia creation story Beowulf Odysseus in the Underworld Virgil: “Aeneas in the Underworld” African Mwindo Epic Roman: “Cupid and Psyche” Egyptian/Greek (Plutarch) “Isis and Osiris” Indian: “The Tale of Tulisa” (Ludwig Friedlander) Mabinogion:Pwyll Prince of Dyfed: 3-20, Manawydan son of Llŷr (excerpt): 35-37 The Ballad of Mulan The Amazons Prometheus “Stories of Anansi” (African/Ashanti) American Indian Trickster Tales Polynesian Trickster Tales