Document Design and Goals – Ikea’s Billy Bookcase

Describe how the AACN Essentials were established and how your project will meet each of these essentials. Https://www(dot)aacnnursing(dot)org/Portals/42/Publications/DNPEssentials.pdf. AACN essentials are 8 please correlate each with the project title “The Role of Providers on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.”

Review Essays In a review essay you identify the author’s thesis, method, sources and argument and also offer a critique of the argument. Does it convince you? If so why? If not why not? Pay close attention to how the scholar uses evidence to support an argument. Review essays help us build our own personal food studies library.

Our topic is “Concerns regarding the Safety of Students and faculty at the University of Maryland. ” Part II: Literature Review and Available Models and your primary research so far. （10 pages are minimum） Here you will identify and discuss resources currently available on this subject, both within the immediate context of the problem/opportunity you are addressing, as well as at large. For example, if there is already a great deal of internal documentation at the office/department/organization/company you are addressing, you can mention what these resources are, in addition to any available scholarly or other popular research. The items discussed here should be listed in your bibliography. Most importantly, you will want to identify examples of other offices/departments/organizations/companies that have encountered the same issue and who may have already developed solutions. Likely, your audience is not the first to encounter the problem you’ve identified. Who else has attempted to address the same or similar problem, and how have they gone about it? Provide Primary Research (original research) you conducted. This should include at least ONE survey and TWO-THREE interviews. (If your group has four members, you NEED THREE interviews.) Note: We already have 150+ responses from the survey. we will attach the survey. For the interview, we only have 2 interviewer’s title and name. You can come up with your own interview questions and answers to support your writing. Part III: Proposed Solution (5 pages minimum) Based on your assessment of the problem/opportunity, and the available research and models you identified, outline your solution in detail. Carefully provide the analysis that led you to this proposed solution, providing any additional evidence. Be as detailed as possible about the nature of the solution, costs/time/etc. We have 3 solutions now. You can find them in our attached outline. For your convenience, feel free to edit our outline if you want to. As long as everything is well explained and follow the instructor’s instruction, you can edit an outline or interview by yourself and write into our essay. Required 13 academic/journal article sources with MLA citation. Hi our final solution or best recommend solution is More police patrol shift during the night!

Assignment Guidelines: Select one artist covered in the lecture and one of their artworks to critique. Title the essay in a way that provides anticipation for the content of the essay. In the introductory paragraph of your essay, introduce the artist and artwork providing background information for each. For example: What is the artist’s name? What is their nationality? Where do they live? What type of work do they make? What artwork are you going to cover? What is its title? What materials is it made out of? When was it made? How is the piece experienced? At the end of the introductory paragraph, provide your thesis. This is your critique of the artwork. There are many judgements you may have for the work of art you are writing about and it is up to you to develop those into your critique. If you are struggling to develop your critique, start with considering the effectiveness or impact of the artwork. Does the artwork change the way you think about something? Does it not? Does it make you think differently about some ideas, but not others? Does the work operate only on sensationalism or shock value? Is the work well-researched and nuanced providing many interpretations by many different people? In the following paragraphs, describe the artwork at length and provide your arguments that support and flesh out your critique of the artwork. In these paragraphs, you are answering WHY you critique the artwork in this way. In your concluding paragraph, relay your thesis (that is not just re-stating it) that summarizes your perceived impact of the work of art. Think about the artwork’s personal impact upon you, the cultural impact of the artwork, the historical impact, and/or the political impact of the artwork. 7. Embed an image of the work you discussed within your essay. Add an appropriate citation to your Works Cited page. Examples of art critics writing art reviews: Roberta Smith’s review of Orlan from 1993. David J. Getsy’s review of Cassils from 2017. Kara Q. Smith’s review of Stelarc from 2012. Technical Requirements: Your response to this assignment must contain between 500 – 700 words to receive top marks with a maximum of 700 words in length (not including bibliography). Your response must be conceptually polished and fully edited when submitted as a finished product. Your response must be submitted to its assigned CANVAS assignment box by the due date and time assigned for this assignment. All research sources used must be fully and accurately documented using the citation standards of the Modern Language Association (MLA). See Writing Guidelines and Student Sample Paper for more information. Your response must be formatted in a readable typeface (e. g., Arial, Times New Roman, Helvetica) and saved as a DOC/DOCX (Microsoft word) file. No other file formats will be accepted for evaluation. Double-spaced, 12 pt. font size, 1-inch margins on all sides, and only one space after periods or other punctuation marks. Provide a title for all written assignments for modules 1-6 and for the final paper. When submitting your response to the CANVAS assignment box, please label your file “FIRST NAME LAST NAME ASSIGNMENT #”. For example, “Sidney Mullis Assignment 4”. Successful participation in this module exercise will demonstrate the student’s ability to: Identify and analyze this recorded lecture, as well as perform self-directed research to relay an understanding of contemporary art themes, practices, artworks and art terminology. Identify and analyze this recorded lecture, as well as perform self-directed research to relay an understanding of historical, cultural, social and political events and ideologies that implicate contemporary culture. Define, apply, and convey his / her understandings of and opinions about contemporary art in discipline-specific written conventions.

Write a paper (1,250-1,750 words) describing the approach to care of cancer. In addition, include the following in your paper: Describe the diagnosis and staging of cancer. Describe at least three complications of cancer, the side effects of treatment, and methods to lessen physical and psychological effects. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. Rubrics: 1 Unsatisfactory 0-72% 0.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 72-75% 75.00% 3 Satisfactory 76-79% 79.00% 4 Good 80-89% 89.00% 5 Excellent 90-100% 100.00% 80.0 %Content 30.0 %Explanation of the Diagnosis and Staging of Cancers is Provided. An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is not provided. An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided but is missing relevant information. An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided that meets the assignment criteria. An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided that is offered in a detailed manner. An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided that is offered in a detailed manner, while demonstrating higher level or critical thinking. 20.0 %At Least Three Complications of Cancer are Identified With Comprehensive Discussion of Available Treatments. Less than three complications of cancer are identified. At least three complications of cancer are identified but lacking a comprehensive discussion of available treatments. At least three complications of cancer are identified with a comprehensive discussion of available treatments. More than three complications of cancer are identified with a comprehensive discussion of available treatments. More than three complications of cancer are identified with a comprehensive discussion of available treatments, while demonstrating higher level or critical thinking. 30.0 %Provides Recommendations to Address Physiological and Psychological Side Effects of Care. Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are lacking. Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are missing relevant information. Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care meet the assignment criteria. Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are offered in a detailed manner. Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are offered in a detailed manner, while demonstrating higher level or critical thinking. 15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 5.0 %Format 2.0 %Paper Format (1- inch margins; 12-point-font; double-spaced; Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. 3.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. 100 %Total Weightage

Discussion – Week 1 (preferred related to Psychiatric care since I work as a Psych Nurse) COLLAPSE Defining Quality As health care consumers, we all expect quality care and positive outcomes. It is important as professionals that we meet these demands of health care consumers. Consider the work of the major theorists you examined in this week’s Resources, and think about how these theories apply to your own experience as a health care customer and/or practitioner. By Day 3 Post your definition of quality, and apply it to the work of one major quality theorist (e.g., Donabedian, Juran, Deming, Triple Aim (IHI) – Berwick). Identify a practice problem that you have had some experience with as a customer or as a practitioner, and explain how eliminating wasteful practices could have improved the experience. Include how your definition of quality applies to that experience. Support your response with references from the professional nursing literature. Your posts need to be written at the capstone level (see checklist). Notes for Initial Post: A 3-paragraph (at least 350 words) response. Be sure to use evidence from the readings and include in-text citations. Utilize essay-level writing practice and skills, including the use of transitional material and organizational frames. Avoid quotes; paraphrase to incorporate evidence into your own writing. A reference list is required. Use the most current evidence (usually ≤ 5 years old). (Refer to AWE Checklist, Capstone) By Day 7 Read two or more of your colleagues’ postings from the Discussion question. Respond with a comment that asks for clarification, provides support for, or contributes additional information to two or more of your colleagues’ postings. Post a Discussion entry on three different days of the week. See the Discussion Rubric found in the Course Information area. Click on the Reply button below to reveal the textbox for entering your message. Then click on the Submit button to post your message.

See attached document for instructions. Topic I choose was phishing and identity theft. Project Requirements: Create an at least two-page, double line space paragraph format, document on one of the topics listed above or similar (Word Basics). Use the Internet for your resources. Verify information by using at least one additional cross-reference. Incorporate at least one image from Microsoft Word Online Pictures library and one 3D object from online sources. Apply Wrap Text formatting as -Tight (Working with Objects) Use formatting Quick Styles (for example, Heading 1, 2, and 3) to create heading structure throughout your document. Use Heading 1 for the main title of the document. Use at least one heading 2 and one heading 3 within the document. Create a Table of Contents.(Doing More with Word). A document title centered on the page. The document should be at least 5 paragraphs. All paragraphs in the document must be equally indented (Working with Text) Use at least one numbered or a bulleted list somewhere in the document (Working with Text) Create and incorporate a table somewhere in the document, either to display or compare data. Apply a Table Design style of your choice (Working with Objects) Include a footer and header. Add the title of the document on the left and your name on the right in the header (Working with Text) Insert page numbers in the document footer using Insert Page Number function – not typed in manually (Working with Text) Add a hyperlink to your email for sending comments or questions (Working with Text) Add a hyperlink to a website that is relevant to your topic (for example, company’s, product , or an organization’s website. Modify “Text to display” for this hyperlink. (Working with hyperlinks). Add an APA style bibliography of to the web sources or a research material you used (at least 3 different sources). (Doing more with Word) Enter a metadata under Document properties. Document title, author of the document (your name), and keywords. (read the tutorial or watch video) Save a copy of the document as PDF (portable document format) format (Word Basics) To ensure the quality of the document, go through the checklist below before submitting the project.

The instruction for this assignment is included in the files I upload. Please read all files I upload before writing, those materials will help you to understand what the assignment is. The case for this assignment is the one related to apple company. I also upload two samples of writing, but those are for a different case under the same assignment requirement. Don’t include any quotes in writing, this assignment is like writing a letter that will be read by the employees. You can directly use the information or data from resources provided in instructions to help you writing.

1. Provide an assessment of what makes Congoleum a good LBO target. 2. Evaluate the LBO proposal and determine the value of the firm if it undertakes the LBO and compare this to the existing value of the firm. Your valuation analysis (based on the assumptions above) should be the bulk of your report and serve to answer this question. Provide sensitivity analyses. 3. Quantify the incremental effects of the LBO (as compared to no LBO) on Congoleum as a whole, and attribute portions of the sizable purchase premium to: the cost savings in corporate expenses, the step-up of asset values for depreciation, and the interest tax shields. In addition, if any of the value added from the LBO is unexplained by these three factors, explain where you think this additional value may be coming from. 4. Quantify the gains/losses to the various parties involved in this deal, and render an opinion as to the appropriateness of the $38 offer price received by old shareholders. When computing the gains/losses to various parties, make sure to account for the impact of the “equity kicker”and “strip financing.”

Expectations of Privacy and the Cellphone