Great Pyramids – Secret in Plain Sight Visual & Performing Arts Essay

This assignment will deepen your understanding of the experience, mystery, and controversy surrounding the ending of life. Task: Watch the video provided above: “A Death of One’s Own” After watching the video, write an essay that is at least 500 words on your thoughts/reaction/questions to the video. Identify at least 2 concepts from the chapter that are related to the video. Describe these concepts and how they are related to the stories shown in the video. Web site for video : http://digital(dot)films(dot)com(dot)ezproxy(dot)vccs(dot)edu:2048/p_ViewVideo.aspx?xtid=10480

Analyze and evaluate a nursing conceptual model. (I picked Jean Watson’s Theory of human caring) Support your analysis with scholarly references in addition to textbooks. Introduction (4 Points) Choose a nursing theorist that you most identify with and who has the most similarity to your beliefs about nursing. Explain your rationale for selecting the theorist. Describe the theorist’s background and how it may have impacted the model development. Analysis (6 points) Origins of the Model What is the historical evolution of the model? What was the author’s motivation and philosophical claims? Which scholars influenced the author? What world view is reflected in the model? Unique Focus What is the unique focus of the model? What category of nursing knowledge is reflected in the model? Content Describe the concepts and propositions of the model. Provide a diagram. Complete the table found in the shared documents concerning the metapardiagm. Evaluation (6 Points) Explication of Origins Are the model’s philosophical claims explicit? Is the influence of scholars acknowledged? Comprehensiveness of Content Are the metaparadigm concepts clearly described? Do the relational propositions link the concepts? Is the model sufficiently broad to guide nursing research, education, administration and practice? Logical Congruence Is one congruent frame of reference evident? Generation of Theory What theories have been generated from the model? Legitimacy Is application of the model feasible? Is the model compatible with expectations of recipients of nursing? Does the model make a difference in health conditions? Contributions What is the overall contribution of the model to nursing? Application (6 Points) Has the model or derived theory been applied to real world nursing (practice, education, administration)? Cite examples. How might you apply this model or derived theory in a nursing setting? Give examples of a specific situation and comment on the applicability of the theory to the situation. Include how the views of your chosen theorist are congruent with your views of nursing. Writing (3 points) Graduate level writing is required. The paper should be well organized using correct grammar, spelling and APA format. An abstract is required Use the criterion above as APA first level headings (Introduction, Analysis, Evaluation, Application). Address all content below each criterion to ensure that the paper is neat, organized and easy to follow. References must be current (within 5 years) and include scholarly journals The final Turnitin Originality Report must be less than 15%.

– How big is your personal footprint? – How has it changed (if at all) since the first time you completed the assessment six weeks ago? Gotten better. – As a result of taking this course, what steps will you take to make you footprint smaller?

Please follow the instructions from the attachment and complete the project using Fathom 2 as an assistance. The instructions for what to do with Fathom: Use Fathom and the data set to create 5 interesting graphs, either showing a high correlation (in particular if you did not expect one) or a correlation close to zero (when you would have expected a higher one). (Graph tool) Create a summary table for a single attribute, and one for two attributes. (Preferably ones that you used in the graphs above. Write two paragraphs on what you observed, and then ask questions you would be interested in having answered. (Use text tool)

Conduct a collaboration interview with two or three key leaders in your practice setting to determine the measures for your practice problem and associated challenges impacting measurement for your practice problem (include confidentiality, anonymity, access issues, etc.). Perform a literature review on your practice problem that elicits how this problem is measured across the country. By Day 4 Post a description of the measures identified from the interviews, the challenges to obtaining the data that were discussed, and a summary of how this quality indicator is measured in the literature. Discuss any gaps in the data that were identified and additional sources that might be needed to obtain this data. Be sure to support your practice problem with the literature that indicates the relevance of this problem for nursing practice. Provide evidence from practice and data that is available.

Hamartia is a literary term meaning “tragic flaw”. It is the personal quality that brings about the downfall of the tragic hero. In this play, for example, ambition is often identified as Macbeth’s tragic flaw, the quality that leads to his destruction, but what about Lady Macbeth? In a well-structured essay, examine the tragic flaw that leads to Lady Macbeth’s downfall.

We need to research and write about a biological influence and psychological/social influence on a chosen facet of sexuality. I have attached a topics list to pick from. I would prefer the topic “pair bonding” but it is largely up the the writer based on the sources they find. We need to find four primary sources to cite to support our claims, two primary sources to support the biological influence on our facet of sexuality and two primary sources to support the the psychological/social influence. I’ve also attached assignment instructions and the rubric, and an APA guide.   PSYCH 204 HUMAN SEXUALITY Research Assignment Instructions Select one facet of human sexuality (e.g., sexual orientation, gender identity, attraction) and discuss BOTH of the following: • A biological influence on your chosen topic • A psychological or social influence on your chosen topic The purpose of this assignment is to help you develop insight into the biological, social, and psychological perspectives that inform issues of human sexuality. As we have seen, many topics in this course are multifaceted and have multiple influencing factors. Examples of topics and hints about what would make an appropriate topic are posted to D2L. The assignment is worth 16% of your final grade. Without approved documentation, late assignments will be penalized 10% per day, including weekends. Documentation must be submitted before the deadline to be considered. Citations You will need to cite two primary sources for the biological influence and two primary sources for the psychological/social influence, for a total of four primary sources. A primary source includes a book or a peer-reviewed journal article. Using a magazine (such as Scientific American) is not a proper peer-reviewed source and will not get you full marks. Do not use Wikipedia for your references, as Wikipedia is open to edit by anyone and is not peer-reviewed. Remember that you MUST cite every idea that you write about that is not your own. Even if you just cited the same source in the sentence before. When in doubt, include a citation. It is better to paraphrase an idea than to directly quote it – use direct quotes sparingly and only when they are really necessary for impact. Remember though that when you paraphrase it is still an idea from another source and it must be cited. Format The total assignment will be a maximum of four pages, not including your cover page and reference (i.e., up to six pages altogether including the cover page and reference page). Use Times New Roman, 12 pt font, double spaced. Use 1” margins on the page. You must follow proper APA formatting to get full marks (details about APA formatting are posted to D2L)

Assignment brief Choose 3 local + international events and compare them. Intro: basic introduction about events while using the book attached as reference, MUST use book as reference, it’s an assignment requisite. The other references can be from the main websites of the events and other internet sources. Body: Cultural events Local: Middle East Film & Comic Con (MEFCC) International: San Diego Comic Con (SDCC) Sport events: Local: Abu Dhabi Grand Prix International: Monaco Grand Prix. Business events: Local: International Defence Exhibition (IDEX) International: St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) – general information/description about each of the events – Explaining how the chosen events fits into the category (culture, sport, business). – Write a brief comparison – what are similarities/differences between the international event and the one in UAE in each category. – Balance between analytical & descriptive approach.

One is writing guideline and requirements. Another is my writing and the professor’s review. Please revise my writing according to guideline and review. Including but not limited to: adding words, adding new topic paragraph if need, using clear “personal experience”, better using sources, adding other sources, etc. About the original source. The latter two sources may not be extended, but must be retained. ENGLISH 1100 – COMPOSITION I WRITING PROJECT 3: WRITING WITH RESEARCH – TOPIC GUIDELINES Word count: 1,500 (about 6 pages) Grade Value: 25% Sources to be used for Writing Project #3: • Your own ideas and experiences from either your Writing Project 1 (Writing from Personal Experience) to illustrate your ideas. Topic and purpose for Writing Project #3: Topic: Looking back on the experiences you described about a community problem in Writing Project 1 (Writing from Personal Experience). In Writing Project #3, you will formulate a claim about the question and argue that claim based on personal experience and fact-based evidence. Purpose: In Writing Project #3, your question—and the answer to that question—will reflect your stance (a “claim”) on the issue you’re addressing in your essay. You will formulate and argue the claim using source material that provides fact-based evidence, and you will illustrate your claim about the issue by using your own personal experience. What Writing Project #3 is not: WP#3 is not an informative essay or a “how-to” essay. You will not address the reader directly or use source material that offers “advice” to the reader. Your essay must argue a claim about an issue. Process for Developing Writing Project #3: Develop and organize your WP3 first version: Using your outline as a template, develop your ideas to create a WP3 first version: • Create an introduction: Refer to your experience you told a story about in Writing Project #1 then transition into the broader issue that this experience raised. Ask your “main” question about the community problem and provide a thesis that states your claim in answer to the question. • Develop supporting paragraphs (from your supporting points in your outline): Introduce each supporting paragraph with a topic sentence about a specific aspect of your claim that you want to explore. After each topic sentence, present information (from your own experience and ideas and from source material, correctly cited) that expands on idea in the topic sentence. • Write a conclusion: Refer back to your experiences in Writing Project 1 and reflect on your own experience and what you learned from your research that can help your community. • Format a works cited listing to include citations for the outside sources, formatted in MLA style. • Follow guidelines for development of ideas and use and citation of source material. Wp3 first versions that do not meet the minimum word requirement (1,500 words) and do not correctly use and cite sources both in-text and in the Works Cited listing will have points deducted. Write your final version of Writing Project 3 (100 points): Based on the comments of your peer review partner(s) and the instructor as well as your own ideas for revision, you will decide if you want to revise to create a WP3 final version. WP3 final versions that do not have correctly cited sources both in-text and in the Works Cited listing will not receive a passing grade; once a final version is submitted, you will not have an opportunity to revise.

FINAL PAPER: A single image of fashionable dress, as defined by the focus of this course, will serve as the basis for exploration and analysis of both historical style and the image itself. The image both guides and focuses the paper: a successful paper consistently analyzes the period and each category through the original image. Each paper will address somewhat different topics, but for the most part will consider cultural context, designer, artist, model, materiality, etc. This assignment builds upon the skills developed in Integrative Design Studio and Seminar. Due dates are staggered throughout the semester; each component is graded separately (late work and plagiarism policies in effect for each part). Papers are to be five pages; length assumes Times New Roman or similar font (12 points) or 250 words per page, double-spaced, with a one-inch margin on all sides, and additional footnotes, illustrations, and bibliography, with formal academic structure and language. Spelling and grammar, as well as Parsons-mandated formatting (Chicago Manual of Style, Turabian, 16th edition), will be counted toward your final grade, as well as quality and number (minimum six) of sources.