Positive Behavior Support in Special Education – The Informed Parent

* Using the preliminary work done in your research journals, write a project proposal for your TA’s and lecturer’s approval. Your proposal must contain the sections below, with headings to label each one. While your audience is your instructors who are familiar with the course, you should still be sure to thoroughly and clearly explain your research process and project. * * Introduction of Research Question + Audience Analysis (aim for roughly 300 words): Open this section with a revised version of the research question you submitted in Week 4. Devote the rest of this section to explaining why this question is significant, by answering the following questions: * How will this research question help you address an issue that needs to be considered, especially as society rebuilds post-pandemic? How will this question help you come up with a particular action/solution/intervention to take with your peers to address this issue when we all return to campus? * How will this research question help you get the information you’ll need to pose an effective call to action to your peers? In other words, how will answering this research question help you get your peers to join you? What common knowledge, values, or ideological frameworks will it help you establish with your peers? * * Research Plan (aim for roughly 300 words): This section will explain your plan for answering your research question. * Identify what you don’t know yet. Answer these questions: What are the gaps in your knowledge, and how will you fill those gaps? Which of the following will you do to fill those gaps: more library research, experimentation, participatory observation at a synchronous UCSD source, or some other research activities? * Propose a detailed timeline for yourself for the last five weeks of the quarter so that you can complete the research project by its due date. What will you complete, and by when? You must note in this timeline what synchronous UCSD source you are planning to attend before the week 8 deadline to submit your annotated bibliographic entry for this specific source. * * * Annotated Bibliography (aim for roughly 500 words): For the last section of your proposal, include two annotated bibliographic entries (about 250 words per source), in APA format, to show the research you have done thus far. One entry should be for any DOC course text (assigned or suggested from any quarter) that helps you answer your research question. The remaining entry should be for an outside source you have found through library database searches. Remember to consult our library guide on how to structure annotated bibliographic entries (https://ucsd(dot)libguides(dot)com/DOC3/annotatedbib). Each annotation should include a critical summary of the source’s argument (in your own words), an evaluation of the usefulness of the source in helping you answer your research question, and a description of how you plan to utilize the source in your final research project. * NOTE ON SOURCE USE IN THE PROPOSAL: You may reference sources in your project proposal that are not included in your annotated bibliography as long as you fully utilize APA citation requirements and list the sources on a separate References page at the end of your proposal.

One is writing guideline and requirements. Another is my writing and the professor’s review. Please revise my writing according to guideline and review. Including but not limited to: adding words, adding new topic paragraph if need, using clear “personal experience”, better using sources, adding other sources, etc. About the original source. The latter two sources may not be extended, but must be retained. ENGLISH 1100 – COMPOSITION I WRITING PROJECT 3: WRITING WITH RESEARCH – TOPIC GUIDELINES Word count: 1,500 (about 6 pages) Grade Value: 25% Sources to be used for Writing Project #3: • Your own ideas and experiences from either your Writing Project 1 (Writing from Personal Experience) to illustrate your ideas. Topic and purpose for Writing Project #3: Topic: Looking back on the experiences you described about a community problem in Writing Project 1 (Writing from Personal Experience). In Writing Project #3, you will formulate a claim about the question and argue that claim based on personal experience and fact-based evidence. Purpose: In Writing Project #3, your question—and the answer to that question—will reflect your stance (a “claim”) on the issue you’re addressing in your essay. You will formulate and argue the claim using source material that provides fact-based evidence, and you will illustrate your claim about the issue by using your own personal experience. What Writing Project #3 is not: WP#3 is not an informative essay or a “how-to” essay. You will not address the reader directly or use source material that offers “advice” to the reader. Your essay must argue a claim about an issue. Process for Developing Writing Project #3: Develop and organize your WP3 first version: Using your outline as a template, develop your ideas to create a WP3 first version: • Create an introduction: Refer to your experience you told a story about in Writing Project #1 then transition into the broader issue that this experience raised. Ask your “main” question about the community problem and provide a thesis that states your claim in answer to the question. • Develop supporting paragraphs (from your supporting points in your outline): Introduce each supporting paragraph with a topic sentence about a specific aspect of your claim that you want to explore. After each topic sentence, present information (from your own experience and ideas and from source material, correctly cited) that expands on idea in the topic sentence. • Write a conclusion: Refer back to your experiences in Writing Project 1 and reflect on your own experience and what you learned from your research that can help your community. • Format a works cited listing to include citations for the outside sources, formatted in MLA style. • Follow guidelines for development of ideas and use and citation of source material. Wp3 first versions that do not meet the minimum word requirement (1,500 words) and do not correctly use and cite sources both in-text and in the Works Cited listing will have points deducted. Write your final version of Writing Project 3 (100 points): Based on the comments of your peer review partner(s) and the instructor as well as your own ideas for revision, you will decide if you want to revise to create a WP3 final version. WP3 final versions that do not have correctly cited sources both in-text and in the Works Cited listing will not receive a passing grade; once a final version is submitted, you will not have an opportunity to revise.

Review the “Marketing Excellence: Coca-Cola” case study on pp. 611 of your textbook. Reflect on the successes that Coca-Cola has had with respect to its new product introductions. What would you recommend in the future with respect to not only new product introductions but also mass communication methods? As you analyze, think about how Coca-Cola can most effectively reach multiple target markets. Your entry must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.

Please see the enclosed documents for assignment details. Please use additional documents for background information. How can we maintain program momentum for different health and community-related programs in the field of healthcare? This should include an analysis of a sustainability tool of your own choosing – SustainTool.Org.

PARADOX SETUP There are 10 identical boxes on a shelf, each with a padlock. There is only 1 key that can open all of these 10 boxes and Stu has the key. Prof places a unique token (called a “test”) into 1 of the 10 boxes. Stu then locks them all and leaves the room. Prof can move the boxes around in any way she wants, but she must line them up on the shelf from left to right. When Stu comes back into the room, he will open the boxes from left to right. Now imagine that Stu is playing against Prof in a game. The rules are that Prof wins if she can create an algorithm (i.e., a method) to guarantee that Stu is surprised when he opens the box that contains the token. So, Stu is absolutely certain that the test is in one of the boxes and he knows that Prof wants to win the game and will do her best to surprise Stu. Stu wins the game if Prof’s algorithm does not guarantee that Stu will be surprised. • If we assume that everyone involved is perfectly rational, who will win this game, Stu or Prof? • If you think that Prof will win, provide the strategy that you think she can win with, along with an explanation for why it guarantees that Stu will be surprised. • If you think that Stu will win, explain in detail why it will be impossible for Prof to come up with any algorithm that wins with 10 boxes. Will Stu win regardless of how many boxes Prof can use? Explain. Answer section 1 (300 words), section 2 (150 words), and section 3 (150 words) This easy is essay 2 which called group essay in the requirement, it need to separate in to three section.

The effective nurse educator employs a variety of formative and summative techniques during curriculum implementation to monitor student learning. A well-developed lesson plan employs both formative and summative assessments. A nurse educator should plan to use data from these assessments to guide instruction. The purpose of this assignment is to employ a variety of assessment strategies to guide instruction and evaluate learning. Using the Topic Materials and your own research, write a 900-1,200 word paper describing your plan to evaluate student learning in your capstone lesson plan. Include the following criteria: Description of one formative assessment strategy to be used in lesson plan with rationale. Explanation of how the data from the formative assessment will guide your instruction. Description of one summative assessment strategy to be used in the lesson plan with rationale. Explanation of how the data from the summative assessment will guide your future lesson plan revisions. Description of the instructor satisfaction survey to be administered to students. Explanation of how data from the instructor satisfaction survey will guide your teaching practice. Cite two or three peer‐reviewed/scholarly resources no more than 5 years old in your paper. Prepare this assessment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Strategic Marketing – Cheese Place Analysis ShopNiche is a company you create before. Do the Place Analysis for the company you assign already – on the order # 00123717 There is a guide in Excel attachment( “Guide 3 – Place.xlsx”) you need to meet all these requirements from that, please read each requirement carefully , make sure you did all the things that assigned. There are several attachments you might found help to write your papers Make sure the guides are all in the Excel sheet, please include all the requirements. I just post an example of the “Example of Place Analysis” in the attachments which you might could find some help for this section. Please do this correctly. NEED TO SUMBIT ON THE Turnitin. Will check similarity. Submission will be sent to Turnitin to be electronically reviewed for plagiarism. Make sure you did your own work, use your own language to answer all the questions

his written assignment walks you through an analysis of these two assessments (The assessments result is attached). You will be instructed to create tables to help you analyze your results. I would like you to copy and paste these directions into a word document and complete the exercise by filling in the tables provided and answering the questions as directed. No need to create your own assignment format—just use the one provided.( the tables is attached ) Please note that the word count guidance provided throughout this assignment are guidelines not minimums or maximums. Guidelines are provided to give you a sense for how much detail you should be providing to complete the assignment effectively.

I need one comparison essay research. it must have 4 paragraph with 1 hook ( introduction ). I need to compare in The stages of persecution ( that is : propaganda/loss of rights – increased violence – segregation/separation – death camps ) you have to choose two of this and compare the Night Book with Congo war in that two stages. it must have 4 quote in each paragraph. 2 quote from The Night book and 2 quote from sources ( it must have at least 3 sources, and sources shouldn’t be wikipedia, please use valid sources. so I need 1 hook, 4 body paragraph, 4 quote in each paragraph, 2 from “The Night” book, and 2 from sources, that mean 16 quote at all. and the essay is about comparing persecution’s and genocide’s that happened in Congo war and “The Night” book. and keep in mind, that it should be in MLA format.

Week 2 – Discussion: The Informed Parent Browse the following web resources, especially looking for information regarding legal rights of parents and persons with disabilities: Center for Parent Information and Resources, compiled under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs No. Be sure to click on the link to Resources and explore the range of parent information. Click on a few links that have to do with legal topics (such as IEP meetings) and explore the breadth of information. LD Online: Working with Families. Browse the resources, especially topics that have to do with “rights” and legal areas such as IEP meetings. Learning Disabilities Association of America. Scroll down and browse several resources that are focused on parent “rights” and legal topics. The California Department of Education listing of California Parent Organizations. Respond to the following questions. Briefly reflect on some of the resources for parents that you found. How do you feel parents might respond to these web resources? In what way do they help parents become “informed parents”? What resources do you feel were missing? What stands out to you as beneficial and unique about these resources? How might they be helpful? Alternately, can you envision any difficulties with parent use of the resources? How can education professionals utilize these resources in their collaboration with parents?