Post and Reply 2.5. Biological & Biomedical Sciences Essay

Case Study: Boutique Hotels Read the Boutique Hotels case study on pages 100 – 101 of your textbook, and answer the three questions at the end. 1. What are the operational challenges associated with developing new boutique hotels? 2. What can we learn from the mass customization of tangible goods that can be applied to the mass customization of services (boutique hotels)? 3. How can boutique hotels maintain a consistent/ standard level of service without compromising their unique/ personalized service mission?

Annotated Bibliography Sample/Help https://owl(dot)purdue(dot)edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/annotated_bibliographies/annotated_bibliography_samples.html

I would like you to reflect back on what you have learned up to the class to this point. You may choose try to pinpoint the main shifts and debates in European politics; and the ways in which countries have responded/adapted to these shifts. You may also choose to discuss contemporary European events and how our course enables you to understand these events in a different light.

The main goal is to demonstrate understanding of the week’s readings and put the authors in conversation with each other. Compare/Contrast or otherwise examine at least two readings from the week and how they relate (or don’t) to each other, the theme of the week, and the course as a whole. Responses should have a thesis, analysis of the articles, and your own opinions. Do not simply summarize or paraphrase the articles.

Due: After Unit 13 Length: 1200–1500 words Weight: 10% of final grade Format: Assignment files should be prepared using MS Word to allow your tutor to insert comments and feedback. If you do not have this software, contact your tutor to discuss whether other arrangements can be accommodated. Instructions: This assignment should be done after studying Units 12 and 13 and completing the quizzes for these units. Complete both case studies. Case Study A (50%): Marlie carries on a business of selling new and used lamps. In 2009, she obtained an operating line of credit from the Bank of Nova Scotia. Marlie gave the bank a security interest in all her present and future assets. Jordan is a dealer in imported chandeliers. He and Marlie agree that he will give her possession of a dozen chandeliers to sell on his behalf. Marlie is not obliged to pay for the chandeliers unless she keeps them for more than 30 days. Marlie goes into default on her loan. The bank seizes all of her inventory, including the 12 chandeliers. Jordan finds out about the seizure and demands the chandeliers, saying that they are his, but the bank disputes this. Is Jordan entitled to get the chandeliers back? Structure your answer following the Marking Rubric below. Marking Rubric Marking Criteria Mark 1. In relation to the contest between the bank and Jordan, identifies the legal question in relation to the chandeliers, which is raised by the scenario. /10 2. Identifies and explains the possible legal relationship between Jordan and Marlie that may benefit Jordan and why it would benefit him. /10 3. Identifies the factual elements, which must be proved to show the existence of the legal relationship referred to above. /10 4. Analyzes the scenario to see if the factual elements referred to above are present. /10 5. Comes to a conclusion concerning the strength of Jordan’s claim based on the analysis above. /10 Total /50 Case Study B (50%): Luke owns a lifeguard consulting company, supplying lifeguarding services to public and private schools in Edmonton. One of his female employees has made a complaint to the Alberta Human Rights Commission against Luke concerning gender discrimination and sexual harassment in the workplace. The employee alleges that she and the other women lifeguards were recently forced to wear newly issued skimpy company bikinis instead of the previous one-piece suits while performing their lifeguarding duties. Those who refused would be given last choice on shifts (which, practically speaking, meant that they would be getting no shifts). The complainant protested to Luke but eventually gave in since it was too late in the summer to find another job. Additionally, the employee claims that, since the female staff was forced to wear the bikinis, Luke drops in constantly for site visits. His visits with females are more frequent and much longer lasting than with male staff. In fact, it is alleged that these visits have earned him the nickname of “Leering Luke.” Several female employees have told Luke that they find his behaviour unwelcome and are uncomfortable wearing the bikinis. Luke knows about his nickname but stands behind his policy. According to Luke, business has increased and, as a result, there has been more to “supervise” at each visit. Explain the concepts of gender discrimination and sexual harassment. Identify facts in the scenario which may support the employee’s claim and consider what other unstated facts, if proved, might also provide support. Identify a defense that Luke may raise. State your conclusion whether the situation involved discrimination or harassment, referring to the relevant facts and the strength of the defense. The following websites will help you with Case Study B: Alberta Human Rights: Discrimination (PDF) Alberta Human Rights Commission: Sexual harassments Alberta Human Rights Commission: Bona fide occupational requirements Structure your answer following the Marking Rubric below. Marking Rubric Marking Criteria Mark 1. Identifies and explains the legal descriptions (or definitions) of gender discrimination and sexual harassment. /10 2. Lists the facts that may tend to show discrimination or harassment and explain why they do. Suggests any other facts which are not stated but might be implied that also support the claim. /15 3. Identifies and explains a defense Luke may raise in relation to his actions. Suggests facts which are not stated but might be implied that undermine this defense. /15 4. Arrives at a reasoned conclusion based on all the facts and the strength of the defense. /10 Total /50

Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, review Enduring Illusions: The Social Organization of Secrecy and Self-Serving Justifications: Doing Wrong and Feeling Moral, and watch Bernie Madoff The $50 Billion Ponzi Scheme (Links to an external site.) Identify one other example of a similar instance of corporate fraud that allows for an ethical analysis, and then discuss the following questions: What ethical framework in our society allows for this kind of fraud to happen? What ethical or moral framework are perpetrators of corporate fraud operating under? Is this kind of fraud an inevitable result of corporate expansion or can the profit motive that undergirds corporate growth be controlled through moral regulators? Should it be controlled?

Persuasive letter to my friend

Cooperative Learning Groups Research Design Exercise This exercise is designed to help you choose a research design for your proposal. Use your cooperative learning group to help you settle on a final design. I don’t expect anyone to be able to answer all of these questions right now. However, finding the answers to these questions will help guide your final proposal. Instructions Take 15–20 minutes and answer as many of the questions that follow as possible. You have answered some of these questions in the past; others will be new for you. Remember, it is okay for your research questions or design to change as you learn more about the feasibility of your evaluation. Questions you don’t feel comfortable with or are unsure about, leave blank and ask your cooperative learning group for help. 1. What is your research question? What are the major effective measures to support mental health program? 2. What is the outcome you are studying or what are the variables you are studying if it is not an outcome study?Better effectiveness in implementing mental health care program for individuals in the community. 3. Is this a qualitative or quantitative study? Does it have elements of both? Explain.This will be a Quantitative data in order to help one see the big picture of my research. 4. Is it a formative or summative evaluation? Explain. It will be a summative for me to be able to analyze my achievement in the end of my research. 5. What is the design of your study? What are the strengths of this design? What are the limitations? A case study design 6. From whom will you collect data? Staff members /co-workers 7. Will you use a sample? If so what is your sampling strategy? 8. What method will you use to collect the data (survey, interviews, administrative or secondary data, etc.)? Convenience 9. Are there any ethical or IRB issues with your study? After completing as many of these questions as possible, meet with your cooperative learning group. Each member of the group will present your research question(s) and summarize his or her design. Then, the presenting group member should share questions with which they are struggling. As a group, discuss next steps for the presenting member’s final research or evaluation proposal. We will discuss requirements for the final research proposal during next week’s session. In addition, provide the following feedback to each presenter: 1. If he or she has presented a design, identify one threat to the internal validity of the study (Remember, this does not mean you have to change your design, you just have to be aware of this limitation. All studies have limitations.). 2. Provide one suggestion for how you think the study can be improved or made more feasible.

Analyze and evaluate a nursing conceptual model. (I picked Jean Watson’s Theory of human caring) Support your analysis with scholarly references in addition to textbooks. Introduction (4 Points) Choose a nursing theorist that you most identify with and who has the most similarity to your beliefs about nursing. Explain your rationale for selecting the theorist. Describe the theorist’s background and how it may have impacted the model development. Analysis (6 points) Origins of the Model What is the historical evolution of the model? What was the author’s motivation and philosophical claims? Which scholars influenced the author? What world view is reflected in the model? Unique Focus What is the unique focus of the model? What category of nursing knowledge is reflected in the model? Content Describe the concepts and propositions of the model. Provide a diagram. Complete the table found in the shared documents concerning the metapardiagm. Evaluation (6 Points) Explication of Origins Are the model’s philosophical claims explicit? Is the influence of scholars acknowledged? Comprehensiveness of Content Are the metaparadigm concepts clearly described? Do the relational propositions link the concepts? Is the model sufficiently broad to guide nursing research, education, administration and practice? Logical Congruence Is one congruent frame of reference evident? Generation of Theory What theories have been generated from the model? Legitimacy Is application of the model feasible? Is the model compatible with expectations of recipients of nursing? Does the model make a difference in health conditions? Contributions What is the overall contribution of the model to nursing? Application (6 Points) Has the model or derived theory been applied to real world nursing (practice, education, administration)? Cite examples. How might you apply this model or derived theory in a nursing setting? Give examples of a specific situation and comment on the applicability of the theory to the situation. Include how the views of your chosen theorist are congruent with your views of nursing. Writing (3 points) Graduate level writing is required. The paper should be well organized using correct grammar, spelling and APA format. An abstract is required Use the criterion above as APA first level headings (Introduction, Analysis, Evaluation, Application). Address all content below each criterion to ensure that the paper is neat, organized and easy to follow. References must be current (within 5 years) and include scholarly journals The final Turnitin Originality Report must be less than 15%.

A few ideas for winning : ) ❏ Remember to make a copy of this document. Then change the part that has my name to the college you are in and the semester and year to your name and first initial. ❏ You will turn in this whole document online, not just the answers. I also need the questions : ) ❏ There is no quiz for this section ❏ Read the lecture note and then watch the video in order to answer the questions. ❏ Write an i123a note on the video.paulanderson.bozmanscience.cladogram.anerseniiaqauticus.youtube❏ Answer the 4 questions and turn in. . Classification using cladograms worksheet (10 pts)You will turn in this worksheet. ________________________________________This section is designed as an easy points getter : )The path the course is now taking is to identify traits/characteristics and to think about how those traits have affected the species in question. For example, we have reviewed a bit about the changes in the skeletons of humans and other species. In those things we have noted skeletons have changed in a sequence overtime in that;● Human types have special adaptations which allow and require a two legged walk, aka facultative bipedalism.● There are isolation forces, geographic isolation, which can produce changes in animal types based on the ecosystem. For example,Foster’s Rule.● That variation of species is measurable as noted by Darwin’s Finches.Here in this section, there is a short lesson which gets the student acquainted with the process of biological classification. This is a small and simple lesson to give the idea of distinct traits, and mosaic species. This process can start with some basic assumptions, scientific ones, that things potentially get more complex as they change. It is important to note that a species can become simpler to survive but it also noted that some things become more complex. That being said we will start with the assumption that; things potentially get more complex as they change. Simpler is then older and more complex is newer. Note in following species, Andersenii aquaticus, is about first, the identification of the simply described simplest form of the organism, noted by the membranes (borders) and nothing else distinctive (Table1, Key concept 1.) This lesson assesses Mendel’s first law of: segregation. That is that offspring inherit their traits from parents. Therefore, related species had to get their traits from ones that existed before. It assesses evolutionary theory in showing that organisms tend towards complexity but at time entropy happens and things leave the family line. It shows the theory of phylogenetics ( gene types) and shows the relation in arbitrary time on the cladogram.