Reluctant To Complain: Quality And Affordability Of Healthcare

Get rid of the picture of yesterday’s car accident and make it as simple as possible. Please divide it into six paragraphs. and As simple as possible. Use words as simply as possible

Think about what is the theme/point behind the story of: “A Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe Please incorporate The Elements of Fiction and please use New Criticism to interpret the story of “A Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe Avoid any and all summary sites within your essay and use MLA format and citations in this essay. Please make sure your essay has a clear introduction and thesis statement (topic plus point about that topic) at the bottom of your introduction. Please introduce your chosen short story in your introduction. Make sure your body paragraphs are focus on proving your thesis statement-theme of the story. Please make sure to have a conclusion that does not bring in new information. Use literary present and third person in your essay.

Week 2 – Discussion: Identifying Learning Disabilities Review Ch. 5 of Exceptional Lives. ( **I don’t have the book so if u can find it online otherwise just google 3 different models to determine the presence of a learning disability) Respond to the following prompt in the Identifying Learning Disabilities by Wednesday: 1)What are the three different models for determining the presence of a learning disability? 2)In your opinion, what are the pros and cons with each model?

You will be expected to find current news articles pertaining to the current topics in the Strategy course and to describe issues related to the 3C’s and 4P’s. Most often, firms that are in the news are in the news for a “bad” reason – they’ve made a mistake and lost customer support which has led to declining purchases, negative word of mouth, etc. Using the week’s relevant material, I’d like for you to: 1. Tell me what the problem is (the firm is experiencing problems because…..) 2. Suggest 1-2 reasons for why the firm might be struggling (e.g., the firm is struggling because it produced a product that is inconsistent with the brand image or the firm is struggling because a competitor produced a better product) 3. Propose a reasonable way forward (i.e., what the firm can do to mitigate losses or to recover from losses in profits). By “reasonable,” I mean a solution the firm could actually implement in order to improve. This recommendation should be specific (not, “I recommend the firm research what consumers want or the firm needs to advertise on social media) and should follow logically from your analysis on the first two points. Full marks will be awarded to assignments with a specific, logical plan of action that makes sense given potential budget constraints. If you recommend overly expensive social media or advertising campaigns without considering the firm’s budget and resources, your recommendation is likely to be considered one that is superficial. That is, your recommendation should be feasible and reasonable, especially given the current economic climate with tight budgets. Your assignment should be no more than 2 pages, double spaced, 12 point font. If you prefer to write less, that is fine as long as you answer the questions put forth above. You will complete four of these assignments and I will drop your lowest score. Because of this policy, I will not accept late submissions. Perhaps unsurprisingly components 2 and 3 above are the most important parts of the assignment and will be weighed most heavily. All material should come from current issues in the news – I do not want you focusing on problems firms faced and “solved” a year ago, I want you to focus on the issues of that week. Trusted news sources include many major media outlets (WSJ, Financial Times, NY Times) as well as marketing trade publications (American Marketing Association, AdWeek). Please avoid using opinion pieces for the basis as they are not held to the same standards of journalistic integrity and might be biased. I will provide feedback on your written assignments – as such, they might take some time to grade, especially if I am unable to access consistent childcare during the pandemic (1-2 weeks). Please keep this in mind.

View the following two video clips: Hard Times Generation: Homeless Kids can be found at: https://www(dot)youtube(dot)com/watch?v=ZZj3hr0OZzw (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.) Hard times generation homeless kids 60 Minutes YouTube Hard Times Generation: Families Living in Cars can be found at: https://youtu(dot)be/fKJRGU-JrPs (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.) Hard Times Generation Families living in cars YouTube According to the narrator, Scott Pelley (NBC 60 Minutes, 2011), close to 25% of children in the US (that is 1 out of 4) live in poverty. In the video, Pelley interviews a number of children (and family members) who have experienced homelessness, living on the streets, in cars, and in shelters. As you reflect on the video and on Chapter 1 of the text Behavior Management: Principles And Practices of Positive Behavior Support, consider how various theorists would assess the needs of children living in poverty. Select two of the following theoretical frameworks: Developmental Psychodynamic Ecological Social Learning Discuss how proponents of each framework would analyze two of the children or families in the videos. What would they want educators to know or be aware of as they structure learning environments for each child? What were some sources of strength for the child (children) or the family? How might teachers make use of those sources of strength in creating educational environments that support learning?

Develop a presentation no longer than 10-12 minutes, with comprehensive speaker’s notes, that covers all of the major areas of your proposal. on Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Revision according to the instruction: – Please choose another book for the third one. File attached. This essay’s prompt is lovers – wives from ILIAD, SAPPHO, ODYSSEY, GENESIS, JOB, SONG OF SOLOMON, HISTORIES, ORESTEIA, ANTIGONE, FATHER COMES HOME FROM THE WARS, SYMPOSIUM, AENEID, METAMORPHOSES. Please choose THREE books to write compare and contrast, how are they different and similar across the texts? and the significance of it. your essay should have an intro with a thesis and a conclusion. It may be a compare and contrast essay, but really the structure and style is up to you. The ideas must be clearly expressed. For the purpose of this essay, the Oresteia will count as one text. Provide a clear thesis, organize your essay carefully, and give particular examples to support your argument. Please do not use any outside source, everything should be based in the books

After reading Chapter 11: “Designing Print and Online Documents” (Markel and Selber) and watching the “Document Design” PowerPoint lecture, turn your attention to the sample technical document linked here. Preview the document: Spend some time studying the design of the document and how those choices suggest a specific audience(s) and purpose(s). In other words, how does the design of the document enable the function of the document? When you have finished studying the document, write a response that addresses the following questions. Support your claims with specific evidence from the document: Markel notes that technical communication serves many purposes, which fall into two broader categories: to “help others learn about a subject, carry out a task, or make a decision” and “to reinforce or change attitudes and motivate readers to take action” (3-4). What is (are) the primary purpose(s) of this document? How and why? What is the relationship between the intended purpose(s) of the document and the document’s primary audience(s)? How and why? Use Markel’s discussion of audience-driven factors (8) to guide your discussion. Finally, how effective is this document in terms of clarity, accessibility, and professional appearance? What recommendations might you make in terms of increasing effectiveness? How and why?

We discussed digital media infrastructures and the way that social stratifications and power hierarchies can result in inequalities of access. For this journal, start by providing a critical synthesis of the readings for the week, including how you feel they relate to each other and what you feel the strengths and weaknesses are. Secondly, consider the following prompt: what do you think is one of the biggest ethical, political, or cultural challenges that we face in our digital media landscapes in the present? Why? only site the provided texts. online article: Andrew Marantz. (2019) “The Dark Side of Techno-Utopianism; Matsakis – What Does a Fair Algorithm Actually Look Like?”

One is writing guideline and requirements. Another is my writing and the professor’s review. Please revise my writing according to guideline and review. Including but not limited to: adding words, adding new topic paragraph if need, using clear “personal experience”, better using sources, adding other sources, etc. About the original source. The latter two sources may not be extended, but must be retained. ENGLISH 1100 – COMPOSITION I WRITING PROJECT 3: WRITING WITH RESEARCH – TOPIC GUIDELINES Word count: 1,500 (about 6 pages) Grade Value: 25% Sources to be used for Writing Project #3: • Your own ideas and experiences from either your Writing Project 1 (Writing from Personal Experience) to illustrate your ideas. Topic and purpose for Writing Project #3: Topic: Looking back on the experiences you described about a community problem in Writing Project 1 (Writing from Personal Experience). In Writing Project #3, you will formulate a claim about the question and argue that claim based on personal experience and fact-based evidence. Purpose: In Writing Project #3, your question—and the answer to that question—will reflect your stance (a “claim”) on the issue you’re addressing in your essay. You will formulate and argue the claim using source material that provides fact-based evidence, and you will illustrate your claim about the issue by using your own personal experience. What Writing Project #3 is not: WP#3 is not an informative essay or a “how-to” essay. You will not address the reader directly or use source material that offers “advice” to the reader. Your essay must argue a claim about an issue. Process for Developing Writing Project #3: Develop and organize your WP3 first version: Using your outline as a template, develop your ideas to create a WP3 first version: • Create an introduction: Refer to your experience you told a story about in Writing Project #1 then transition into the broader issue that this experience raised. Ask your “main” question about the community problem and provide a thesis that states your claim in answer to the question. • Develop supporting paragraphs (from your supporting points in your outline): Introduce each supporting paragraph with a topic sentence about a specific aspect of your claim that you want to explore. After each topic sentence, present information (from your own experience and ideas and from source material, correctly cited) that expands on idea in the topic sentence. • Write a conclusion: Refer back to your experiences in Writing Project 1 and reflect on your own experience and what you learned from your research that can help your community. • Format a works cited listing to include citations for the outside sources, formatted in MLA style. • Follow guidelines for development of ideas and use and citation of source material. Wp3 first versions that do not meet the minimum word requirement (1,500 words) and do not correctly use and cite sources both in-text and in the Works Cited listing will have points deducted. Write your final version of Writing Project 3 (100 points): Based on the comments of your peer review partner(s) and the instructor as well as your own ideas for revision, you will decide if you want to revise to create a WP3 final version. WP3 final versions that do not have correctly cited sources both in-text and in the Works Cited listing will not receive a passing grade; once a final version is submitted, you will not have an opportunity to revise.