The Floating World And Urban Culture In Edo, Japan

Assignment instruction: Identify a model of schooling (experimental education) with which you are familiar and critique it from the perspective of your developing educational aims, values, beliefs and philosophy. The aims of the assignment are: 1. to consider educational aims and values from an international perspective; 2. to clearly articulate your philosophy, aims and values related to education and how these translate into broader school and more specific classroom contexts; 3. to demonstrate criticality in your chosen analysis, justifying your points with thoughtful arguments supported by the literature; 4. to show that you have understood the practical applicability of theoretical constructs in the background reading and to reference accurately this material when you use it in support of your arguments. It is expected that you critique a model of schooling; in order to develop the critical analysis you would need to go beyond providing a descriptive account, engaging critically with the literature to support the arguments made. Please ensure you follow the Harvard Referencing guidelines on accurate formatting. 1) Read the assignment brief carefully and ensure you have a clear focus on that. 2) Read widely and ensure you read recent literature as well as earlier works. 3) Ensure you support the claims you make through references to the literature.

In “Duet for Bear and Dog,” Sybil Rosen examines the trade-offs that have occurred as humans have created modern, “civilized” societies. Do you believe Rosen thinks that the price of civilization is too high? Compose an essay that defends your stance, referencing specific parts of the play that support your claims. Your thesis needs to make a claim about the piece of literature itself. You should assume that your audience is familiar with the piece, so you will not include a summary. Your goal is to enrich the understanding of your audience in regard to the piece of literature you choose to explore. You do not need to create a Works Cited entry for the poem or story you are exploring. To be clear, outside sources are not required, and the primary support for your thesis should come from the piece of literature itself.

Research Paper on the Relationship between Chuch Teachings and Death Penalty Please note that you need to add footnotes, this is a bible subject, the instruction will be uploaded as a picture.

Please complete according to the articles I uploaded and the job requirements.

Project Management Individual Project Management Plan Team Project – Individual Project Management Plan Please read the Team project “Project Charter Uber Tour” doc in the attachment first, Then write the individual project management plan—- focus on the Project Risk Management only 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Objectives 4. Roles and Responsibilities 5. Deliverables 6. For each planning process associated with the knowledge area covered by your plan (as described in class and PMBOK), describe how the process will be handled for the project. You should also list and describe the inputs, tools and techniques and outputs of the process. In PMBOK:[planning process] -Plan Risk Management -Identify Risks -Perform Qualitative Risk Analysis -Perform Quantitative Risk Analysis – Plan Risk Responses -Implement Risk Responses -Monitoring and Controlling Process Group -Monitor Risks Your plan should be written in a narrative format, providing ample description within each section. It is not sufficient to simply provide a series of bulleted lists of materials! There is no length constraint, but plans do not have to be long! You have to keep in mind also that your plan is not intended to summarize the results of analysis and responses. It is supposed to describe how the communications management processes would be executed and who would do that work. Think of your plan as providing instructions to the project team as to how to do the necessary work in this area. Do your own work and make sure you answer all the questions. It will submit on the Turnitin. Submission will be sent to Turnitin to be electronically reviewed for plagiarism.

Following the reading of the articles provided the discussion board, answer the following questions: 5a. In your opinion, what are the motivations to apply Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the field of healthcare? 5b. https://youtu(dot)be/hbqDknMc_Bo Describe 3 examples of data types that have been analyzed by AI systems 5c. Discuss two examples of mechanisms/devices that enable AI systems to generate clinical meaningful results 5d. Describe two disease types that the AI communities are currently tackling. 5e. Identify several future challenges in the implementation of AI in healthcare. * Provide academic or industry source to support your answers. *** Respond to one classmate, provide a substantial comment, and remember to address classmates by their first name.

Please summary this article and give personal response. Zalan, K. (2016, December 26). Learning to Think like an Astronaut.

***UPDATED***** The project is to research a local business in buffalo, and perform an interview asking them if they are facing problems and you offer the solution to them There is market shut down because of manager has emergency issue, and he just disappear, someone want to reopen the market, the problem is plaza owner need them to pay the past rent and if the new owner of market start business in the old place,they can give some money to plaza, to buy the stuffs and equipment in lower price, but they have to pay the vip account saving money for the old market The problem is that if the landlord accepts the full rent, we will not be able to pay the other amount. This means that we will lose customers. If we pay the full balance, it means that our rent will be paid later That should including business plan, mission statement, fianciacs projection and marketing assessment, and investment, it including in filed 2

Cooperative Learning Groups Research Design Exercise This exercise is designed to help you choose a research design for your proposal. Use your cooperative learning group to help you settle on a final design. I don’t expect anyone to be able to answer all of these questions right now. However, finding the answers to these questions will help guide your final proposal. Instructions Take 15–20 minutes and answer as many of the questions that follow as possible. You have answered some of these questions in the past; others will be new for you. Remember, it is okay for your research questions or design to change as you learn more about the feasibility of your evaluation. Questions you don’t feel comfortable with or are unsure about, leave blank and ask your cooperative learning group for help. 1. What is your research question? What are the major effective measures to support mental health program? 2. What is the outcome you are studying or what are the variables you are studying if it is not an outcome study?Better effectiveness in implementing mental health care program for individuals in the community. 3. Is this a qualitative or quantitative study? Does it have elements of both? Explain.This will be a Quantitative data in order to help one see the big picture of my research. 4. Is it a formative or summative evaluation? Explain. It will be a summative for me to be able to analyze my achievement in the end of my research. 5. What is the design of your study? What are the strengths of this design? What are the limitations? A case study design 6. From whom will you collect data? Staff members /co-workers 7. Will you use a sample? If so what is your sampling strategy? 8. What method will you use to collect the data (survey, interviews, administrative or secondary data, etc.)? Convenience 9. Are there any ethical or IRB issues with your study? After completing as many of these questions as possible, meet with your cooperative learning group. Each member of the group will present your research question(s) and summarize his or her design. Then, the presenting group member should share questions with which they are struggling. As a group, discuss next steps for the presenting member’s final research or evaluation proposal. We will discuss requirements for the final research proposal during next week’s session. In addition, provide the following feedback to each presenter: 1. If he or she has presented a design, identify one threat to the internal validity of the study (Remember, this does not mean you have to change your design, you just have to be aware of this limitation. All studies have limitations.). 2. Provide one suggestion for how you think the study can be improved or made more feasible.

Double Spaced Must have at least 2 different sources