Why Science (GRADED 20 pts)

Assignment Guidelines: Select one artist covered in the lecture and one of their artworks to critique. Title the essay in a way that provides anticipation for the content of the essay. In the introductory paragraph of your essay, introduce the artist and artwork providing background information for each. For example: What is the artist’s name? What is their nationality? Where do they live? What type of work do they make? What artwork are you going to cover? What is its title? What materials is it made out of? When was it made? How is the piece experienced? At the end of the introductory paragraph, provide your thesis. This is your critique of the artwork. There are many judgements you may have for the work of art you are writing about and it is up to you to develop those into your critique. If you are struggling to develop your critique, start with considering the effectiveness or impact of the artwork. Does the artwork change the way you think about something? Does it not? Does it make you think differently about some ideas, but not others? Does the work operate only on sensationalism or shock value? Is the work well-researched and nuanced providing many interpretations by many different people? In the following paragraphs, describe the artwork at length and provide your arguments that support and flesh out your critique of the artwork. In these paragraphs, you are answering WHY you critique the artwork in this way. In your concluding paragraph, relay your thesis (that is not just re-stating it) that summarizes your perceived impact of the work of art. Think about the artwork’s personal impact upon you, the cultural impact of the artwork, the historical impact, and/or the political impact of the artwork. 7. Embed an image of the work you discussed within your essay. Add an appropriate citation to your Works Cited page. Examples of art critics writing art reviews: Roberta Smith’s review of Orlan from 1993. David J. Getsy’s review of Cassils from 2017. Kara Q. Smith’s review of Stelarc from 2012. Technical Requirements: Your response to this assignment must contain between 500 – 700 words to receive top marks with a maximum of 700 words in length (not including bibliography). Your response must be conceptually polished and fully edited when submitted as a finished product. Your response must be submitted to its assigned CANVAS assignment box by the due date and time assigned for this assignment. All research sources used must be fully and accurately documented using the citation standards of the Modern Language Association (MLA). See Writing Guidelines and Student Sample Paper for more information. Your response must be formatted in a readable typeface (e. g., Arial, Times New Roman, Helvetica) and saved as a DOC/DOCX (Microsoft word) file. No other file formats will be accepted for evaluation. Double-spaced, 12 pt. font size, 1-inch margins on all sides, and only one space after periods or other punctuation marks. Provide a title for all written assignments for modules 1-6 and for the final paper. When submitting your response to the CANVAS assignment box, please label your file “FIRST NAME LAST NAME ASSIGNMENT #”. For example, “Sidney Mullis Assignment 4”. Successful participation in this module exercise will demonstrate the student’s ability to: Identify and analyze this recorded lecture, as well as perform self-directed research to relay an understanding of contemporary art themes, practices, artworks and art terminology. Identify and analyze this recorded lecture, as well as perform self-directed research to relay an understanding of historical, cultural, social and political events and ideologies that implicate contemporary culture. Define, apply, and convey his / her understandings of and opinions about contemporary art in discipline-specific written conventions.

1.A useful initial step in analyzing any movie is to distinguish an individual scene’s content from its form. Try to first identify a scene’s subject matter: What is this scene about? What happens? Once you have established that content, you should consider how that content was expressed. What was the mood of the scene? What do you understand about each character’s state of mind? How did you perceive and interpret each moment? Did that understanding shift at any point? Once you know what happened and how you felt about it, search the scene for those formal elements that influenced your interpretation and experience. The combination and interplay of multiple formal elements that you seek is the cinematic language that movies employ to communicate with the viewer.（20points） 2.Do any narrative or visual patterns recur a sufficient number of times to suggest a structural element in themselves? If so, what are these patterns? Do they help you determine the meaning of the film? （20points） 3.Do you notice anything particular about the movie’s presentation of cinematic space—what you see on the screen? Lots of landscapes or close-ups? Moving or static camera? （10points） 4.Does the director manipulate our experience of time? Is this condensing, slowing, speeding, repeating, or reordering of time simply practical (as in removing insignificant events), or is it expressive? If it is expressive, just what does it express? （20points） 5.Does the director’s use of lighting help to create meaning? If so, how? （10points） 6.Do you identify with the camera lens? What does the director compel you to see? What is left to your imagination? What does the director leave out altogether? In the end, besides showing you the action, how does the director’s use of the camera help to create the movie’s meaning? （20points）

Choose a kind of childhood trauma and address; How common is it for children to experience this kind of trauma? Are there specific effects that result from this kind of childhood trauma? What kinds of behaviors do children who have undergone this kind of trauma demonstrate? Many trauma interventions are developed from heartfelt concern for children and their families, but have no scientific basis. Give at least one example of an intervention that is well-meant, but not based in science, and one that has a scientific underpinning. Natural disasters Terrorism Illness Abuse Divorce Economic stress Military family stress, PTSD The paper will be submitted in MS word or RTF format only. None of the questions are to be re-copied into your paper. You will be graded on these factors: Possible grade Student grade The paper addresses the issues specified by the assignment 20 The author shows insight and sophistication in thinking and writing 30 Three citations were used; websites are acceptable 20 Paper was well organized and easy to follow. Paper was at least 1000 words, not including cover page, abstract, or references. Running head, cover page, abstract, paper body, in-text citations and Reference page, and overall formatting were in the American Psychological Association format. 20 Few to no spelling, grammar, punctuation or other writing structure errors 10 TOTAL 100

Choose two objects in the current chapters in your textbook that are thematically related (landscapes, portraits, religious subjects, historical monuments, etc.). Write an essay of at least 450 words using 12 point font and double-spaced text) comparing the formal treatment and iconography of each work. Be sure to identify each object by indicating the artist, title, and date of production. Your essay should address how similarities and differences contribute to your understanding of each work’s meaning or artistic significance. You should analyze these points: stylistic choices (e.g., abstract, naturalistic, idealistic, realistic), function or symbolism of the pieces (What were they used for? Do they communicate a message? Are they sacred or secular works of art), cultural context (e.g., how might the way of life at the time and place the pieces were created affected their function and style? Do historical events relate to the image or story depicted?). In addition, I expect you to refer to the course readings, including the primary readings I uploaded to BlackBoard, in the essays. You must cite at least one source that is not our text book. Use Chicago-Turabian style notation for any sources that you need to document as references in footnotes. Double-space your text and list your name and the date in the header on the first page. In almost all cases, you should italicize the title of a work of art. Consult the Chicago-Turabian sample essay I provided you for more information concerning formatting. Include at least two illustrations. Submit your text in DOC, DOCX or PDF format. Due Friday night, 11:59 p.m. Use two objects which I uploaded two different self-portrait to compare. THANK YOU! I expect you to refer to the course readings, including the primary readings I uploaded to BlackBoard, in the essays. You must cite at least one source that is not our text book.” The source is that I uploaded two PDF files which is class 03 and class 04. If you want it, you can use it.

Define The Artistic Movement Connected To The Artist

1. Define the artistic movement connected to the artist (ex. explaining what is Impressionism, Modernism etc.)
2. Provide a brief bio of the artist chosen.
3. Describe the culture/time the artist lived and worked and how this period connects to the artwork. you are going to be talking about Tuni Bunchō’s piece of art titled Tiger Family and Magpies

 

This assignment is a little bit different, please see below: TOPIC: [Public Sphere (including Opinion Leadership) and Affinity Space on Twitter that related to adult learning and education.] 1.Read About HGSE first, we are doing this project for HGSE 2.Read SWOT and Research Proposal_draft2 to get a sense of what our theories are. 3.Read Paper Outline_Draft CURRENT for our current literate review, and follow the comments to do revision(there are 9 of them) 4.The total length of the changes is two pages, which can be made on the original article or in a separate file

Review Essays In a review essay you identify the author’s thesis, method, sources and argument and also offer a critique of the argument. Does it convince you? If so why? If not why not? Pay close attention to how the scholar uses evidence to support an argument. Review essays help us build our own personal food studies library.

Is myth meant to be a substitute for science? If so, are we currently living in a post-mythic world? Responses to essay questions should argue for a specific academic viewpoint Primary evidence from the text must be used to support analysis Warning: Do not simply narrate the texts with no analysis Citations are not necessary i will attach a list of the stories you may use for evidence please only use these stories and cite them well List of stories- these are stories we read in class. Just use examples from these stories you do not need to quote and use citations Morford, M.P.O., Lenardon, R.J., & Sham, M. 2014. ‘Interpretation and Definition of Classical Mythology.’ Classical Mythology. 10th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dalley 228-249 Dalley 249-274 Inca creation story African-Yoruba creation story Metamorphosis Prose Edda Greece- Theogony Mesopotamia creation story Beowulf Odysseus in the Underworld Virgil: “Aeneas in the Underworld” African Mwindo Epic Roman: “Cupid and Psyche” Egyptian/Greek (Plutarch) “Isis and Osiris” Indian: “The Tale of Tulisa” (Ludwig Friedlander) Mabinogion:Pwyll Prince of Dyfed: 3-20, Manawydan son of Llŷr (excerpt): 35-37 The Ballad of Mulan The Amazons Prometheus “Stories of Anansi” (African/Ashanti) American Indian Trickster Tales Polynesian Trickster Tales

How would such structures as this (show in the attachment) have changed and informed the way medieval viewers experienced churches? Why do so few survive? (2-3 paragraphs)

The students for 8-1 are Andre,Tara, comment on Andre comment to Doris, and Lewis . for 8-2 there is one comment for Andre the questions are different in text citations and reference page a total of 5 comments. You can use the students references if you want 8-1 Describe the structure of the Baron EQ/I assessment. How can this assessment lead to a better understanding of interacting with others? Explain. Andre The Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory is a self-report assessment of emotional and social factors that gives an estimate of emotional and social intelligence (Bar-On, 2013). It is a 133-item inventory that scores five areas (intrapersonal and interpersonal factors. stress management skills, situational adaptability and general positive moods). The principle of Bar-On is that if one manages their own responses effectively, it will translate into positive interpersonal relationships with others (Bar-On, 2006). This is due to the idea that one needs to assess their emotional intelligence, in order to respond to their emotions effectively, which affects one’s emotional health and ultimately their psychological well-being (Bar-On, 2013). When these three factors are in balance and the person is not engaging in self-defeating behaviors, one can interact with others effectively as well. Bar-On, R. (2006). The Bar-On Model of Emotional-Social Intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 18, pp. 13-25. http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/3271.pdf Bar-On, R. (2013). Reuven Bar-On. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://www.reuvenbaron.org/wp/ Tara, The structure of the Baron EQ/1 assessment assesses self-perception, interpersonal, decision making, stress management, and self-expression (High Performing Systems, Inc., n.d.). The EQ-i consists of 133 items in the form of short sentences and employs a 5-point response scale with a textual response format ranging from “very seldom or not true of me” (1) to “very often true of me or true of me” (5) (High Performing Systems, Inc., n.d.). It measures socially and emotionally intelligent behavior. Emotional intelligence is believed to be a critical determinant of life success (High Performing Systems, Inc., n.d.). This assessment can lead to a better understanding of interacting with others because the knowledge gained helps guide actions and thoughts towards self and others. One may find new methods that allow their emotional intelligence to become stronger, therefore, providing them with the confidence needed for robust decision making. Reference: High Performing Systems, Inc.. (n.d.). BarOn EQ-i. Retrieved May 16, 2020, from https://www.hpsys.com/EI_BarOnEQ-I.htm This is my post Andre comment answer his comment below The full assessment of the combined emotional social intelligence comprise five major components, viz, Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, Stress Management, General Mood Scale, and Adaptability. Intrapersonal reveals tendencies of self-regard, emotional self-awareness, assertiveness, independence, and self-determination. Interpersonal focuses on empathy, social responsibility, and socialization. Stress Management explores tolerance to stress, and self-control when overwhelmed with emotions. General mood scale checks an individual’s hopefulness and joy.Adaptability deals with life skills especially problem solving techniques, versatility and acceptance of reality How can EQ/I assessment lead to a better understanding of interacting with others? Explain. The components as aforementioned provide a reserve of data about the people around an individual. Proper use of the knowledge gathered from those around you helps one communicate better, handle conflicts peacefully, empathize and handle challenges with confidence (Unknown, 2015). If the behavior at workplace, feelings, and relationship is checked then the quality of life of those around you are likely to be inspired. Reference Unknown Aurhor. (2015).Top of FormTop of Form Emotional intelligence: Managing emotions to win in life. Andre Hello Doris, Your responses are indicative of the primary applicability of Bar-On to interpersonal relationships. Personal emotional well being can have an overwhelmingly positive impact on ho one participates in relationships, which can create healthy families, social structures and healthy communities. It does appear that the creators of Bar-On are looking to apply it more so to human performance in organizational settings. The goal is to maximize one’s potential and produce a concept of “star performer profiling” (Bar-On, 2013). The Bar-On is utilized to select, train and develop high performers by taking the Bar-On scores of employees that predict high performance, placing those employees in leadership training programs and matching the scores with employee performance reports two years after the initial assessment. It does seem that Bar-On has more immediate application in interpersonal relationships. Bar-On, R. (2013). Reuven Bar-On. Retrieved May 16, 2020, from https://www.reuvenbaron.org/wp/ Lewis The ESI measures emotional and social intelligence behavior. (https://ap.themyersbriggs.com/content/EQi_2_0_Model.jpg) Its broken down into five areas; Stress management, self-perception, self-expression interpersonal and decision making. This covers more in-depth with emotional self-awareness, empathy, problem solving, impulse control and optimism. “In brief, the EQ-i contains 133 items in the form of short sentences and employs a 5-point response scale with a textual response format” (2006) EI is a touch tricky as it should show the capacity to be aware and control ones emotions. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Difference-between-low-and-high-emotional-intelligence_fig2_330400643 The tricky part is what side of the scale you are viewing it from. Slow or consistent picky or careful, when we measure things like this or at least in this manner it comes down to social perspective. Not a lot past that. That makes it at least hard for me to better understand how this can help with understanding others or even interacting with them. Sure there is a huge difference between acting out and not, that is why I used the examples that I did. My wife will tell you I am fussy, I would tell you I am meticulous. I would tell you that I am strong willed but others would say I am bossy. Again its all about perspective, and when things like that come down to it, there is no real right or wrong answers. Bar-On, R. (2006). The Bar-On Model of Emotional-Social Intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 18, pp. 13-25. (https://ap.themyersbriggs.com/content/EQi_2_0_Model.jpg) https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Difference-between-low-and-high-emotional-intelligence_fig2_330400643 Lewis did a wheel but it would not copy 8-2 For what situations would the Baron EQ/I assessment be most appropriate or applicable? Explain. Andre The Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory measures emotional and social intelligence (Bar-On, 2013). Emotional intelligence involves abilities, competencies and skills related to understanding oneself and others, relating to peers and family members, and adapting to changing environmental situations and demands. The problem becomes when one uses emotional responses to life situations rather than effective problem-solving. Emotional responses can affect a person’s perspective and interfere with their ability to manage their situations effectivly. The situations in which the Bar-On EQ/I would be most useful are those in which emotional reactivity impacts one’s ability to manage their situations effectively. The two primary areas that I would use Bar-On are when the client is experiencing anger, sadness or anhedonia and this either causes decreased motivation or affects their interpersonal interactions with others either in their career or in their interpersonal relationships. Bar-On, R. (2013). Reuven Bar-On. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://www.reuvenbaron.org/wp/